Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur fractures

被引:3
|
作者
Makaram, Navnit S. [1 ,2 ]
Ross, Lauren A. [1 ]
Keenan, Oisin J. F. [1 ]
Magill, Matthew [2 ]
Moran, Matt
Scott, Chloe E. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Periprosthetic; Total Knee arthroplasty; Prognosis; Predictors; Knee Replacement; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMORAL FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; MORTALITY; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aims to determine which Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture (PDFF) classifica-tion system is the most reliable. The secondary aim was to determine which classification system corre-lated most accurately with the surgical management recommended and delivered. Methods: Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients with 83 PDFFs that extended to the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Age, BMI, time from TKA, operative management, and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were collected, and AP and lateral radiographs used to classify all fractures using seven established clas-sification systems by two observers blinded to management. In patients treated operatively ( n = 69), preoperative radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons with expertise in trauma and knee revision who recommended fixation or distal femoral replacement (DFR) requirement. Results: Mean age was 80.7 years (SD9.4) and 50 (84.7%) were female. PDFFs occurred at a mean 9.5 years (SD5.2) after primary TKA. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years (SD2.9). Management was fixation in 47, DFR in 22 and non-operative for 14. The Fakler classification demonstrated highest interobserver reliabil-ity (ICC = 0.948), followed by the Rorabeck (ICC = 0.903), UCS (ICC = 0.850) and Chen (ICC = 0.906). The Neer classification demonstrated weakest agreement (ICC = 0.633). Overall accuracy of predicting DFR require-ment (as determined by two experts) was highest for the Fakler system (83.9%). Compared with actual management delivered the Rorabeck system was most accurate (94.1%). Multivariate regression demon-strated that the ultimate need for DFR ( n = 22) was independently associated with medial comminution (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI), p = 0.027) and fractures distal to the anterior flange and posterior condyle of the femoral component (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31), p = 0.024). Conclusion: The Fakler classification showed highest interobserver agreement and was most accurately predictive of the management recommended by two experts. No classification system accurately pre-dicted the fractures that required DFR, and none included medial comminution which was independently associated with DFR requirement. There remains a need for a PDFF classification system that reliably guides operative management of PDFFs. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3430 / 3437
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: Current Concepts
    Nauth, Aaron
    Ristevski, Bill
    Begue, Thierry
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 : S82 - S85
  • [2] Reliability of Current Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Fractures of the Humerus
    Auran, Richard L. L.
    Tran, Tram L. L.
    Dehghan, Niloofar
    McKee, Michael D. D.
    Lederman, Evan S. S.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2023, 37 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [3] Results of Low Distal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures
    Virkus, Walter
    Lieder, Charles
    Jang, Yohan
    Rea, Parker
    Gaski, Greg
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2022, 36 (08) : E300 - E305
  • [4] Systematic Review of the Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures
    Ristevski, Bill
    Nauth, Aaron
    Williams, Dale S.
    Hall, Jeremy A.
    Whelan, Daniel B.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2014, 28 (05) : 307 - 312
  • [5] Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur
    Biber, R.
    Bail, H. J.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (05): : 438 - +
  • [6] Dual Plate Fixation of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures
    Andring, Nicholas A.
    Kaupp, Shannon M.
    Henry, Kaitlin A.
    Helmig, Kathryn C.
    Babcock, Sharon
    Halvorson, Jason J.
    Pilson, Holly T.
    Carroll, Eben A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2024, 38 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [7] Classification and Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures
    Ricci, William
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2013, 26 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [8] DEMOGRAPHICS, FRACTURE CHARACTERISTICS, AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES FOR PERIPROSTHETIC DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES COMPARED TO NATIVE DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES
    Kong, S.
    Bautista, B.
    Saiz, A.
    Haffner, M. R.
    Kelley, J.
    Lee, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 70 (01) : 149 - 150
  • [9] Periprosthetic Proximal Femur Fractures: Current Concepts
    Parvizi, Javad
    Vegari, David N.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 : S77 - S81
  • [10] Nail-Plate Constructs for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures
    Mueller, Gudrun E. Mirick
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (05) : 403 - 406