共 50 条
Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Contralateral Eyes of Glaucoma Patients with Unilateral Progression by Conventional Methods
被引:33
|作者:
Liu, Ting
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Tatham, Andrew J.
[1
,2
,5
,6
]
Gracitelli, Carolina P. B.
[1
,2
,7
]
Zangwill, Linda M.
[1
,2
]
Weinreb, Robert N.
[1
,2
]
Medeiros, Felipe A.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Ophthalmol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Daping Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Third Mil Med Univ Peoples Liberat Army, Inst Surg Res, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Princess Alexandra Eye Pavil, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Ophthalmol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
VISUAL-FIELD LOSS;
GANGLION-CELL COUNTS;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
DIAGNOSTIC-PERFORMANCE;
MACULAR THICKNESS;
IMPROVE DETECTION;
DEFECTS;
OCT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.027
中图分类号:
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号:
100212 ;
摘要:
Purpose: To determine whether progressive retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss occurs in the contralateral eye of patients with glaucoma showing unilateral progression according to conventional diagnostic methods. Design: Prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study. Participants: Three hundred forty-six eyes of 173 patients (118 eyes with glaucoma and 228 eyes with suspect glaucoma at baseline) followed up for an average of 3.5 +/- 0.7 years. Methods: All subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP; Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) in both eyes at 6-month intervals. Eyes were determined as progressing by conventional methods if there was progression on masked grading of optic disc stereophotographs or SAP Guided Progression Analysis (GPA; Carl Zeiss Meditec; "likely progression"). Rates of change in SD OCT average RNFL thickness were obtained using a linear mixed effects model. Rate of global loss was calculated using a random coefficient model and compared for nonprogressing patients, progressing eyes, and fellow eyes of unilateral progressing patients. Main Outcomes Measures: Rate of change in global RNFL thickness. Results: Thirty-nine subjects showed evidence of unilateral progression by GPA, disc photographs, or both during follow-up. Mean +/- standard error rate of RNFL loss in eyes progressing by conventional methods was -0.89 +/- 0.22 mm/year (P < 0.001). The contralateral eyes of these subjects also showed significant loss of RNFL over time (-1.00 +/- 0.20 mu m/year; P < 0.001). One hundred thirty-four subjects did not show progression by conventional methods in either eye. These eyes also showed a significant decline over time in average RNFL thickness (-0.71 +/- 0.09 mu m/year; P < 0.001); however, the rate of change in these eyes was slower than that of the contralateral eye of patients showing unilateral progression (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Loss of RNFL thickness was seen in a substantial number of contralateral eyes of glaucoma patients showing unilateral progression by conventional methods. These findings indicate that assessment of RNFL thickness by SD OCT may show progressive glaucomatous damage that is not detected by visual fields or optic disc stereophotography. (C) 2015 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2251
页数:9
相关论文