Fuzzy-based Adaptive Cross Layer Routing Protocol for Delay Sensitive Applications in MANET

被引:0
|
作者
Fathy, Cherine [1 ]
El-Hadidi, Mahmoud T. [2 ]
Abou El-Nasr, Mohamad [1 ]
机构
[1] Arab Acad Sci & Technol & Maritime Transport, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Commun Engn, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Adaptive Routing; Cross-Layer Design; Fuzzy-Logic; Delay-Sensitive Applications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
In order for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) to support service requirements of multimedia and real-time applications, the underlying routing protocol must provide Quality of Service (QoS) in terms of average End-to-End Delay (ETED). Towards this end, we investigate a number of conventional routing protocols, such as AODV (reactive routing) and DSDV (proactive routing), under different traffic and mobility conditions to obtain the lowest average ETED. Then, we develop a new routing protocol that enables each mobile node to separately switch between reactive routing mode and proactive routing mode based on the current node status. It utilizes a fuzzy-based routing mode selector whose inputs are the number of link breaks (LB), the interface queue (IFQ) length, and the type of application for each node (whether Delay-Tolerant "DT" or Delay-Sensitive "DS"). In this paper, applications of interest are delay-sensitive and, therefore, the type of application of each node is set to be Delay-Sensitive ("DS"). Since the selection of the routing protocol (which belongs to Layer 3) is determined based on Layer 1 information (LB), Layer 2 information (IFQ Length) and Layer 7 information (type of application), it is called Adaptive Cross-layer Routing Protocol (ACRP). Using ns-2 network simulation package, it has been shown that the new adaptive routing protocol outperforms AODV by up to 95.3% in average ETED, and up to 84.5% in Route Discovery Latency. Likewise, it outperforms DSDV by up to 95.5% in average ETED, and up to 85.7% in Route Discovery Latency. Moreover, when compared to other QoS-MANET routing protocols, the new protocol achieves improvement in average ETED of up to 83.8% (in case of AMDR), up to 75% (in case of NQoS AODV) and up to 32% improvement in Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) (in case of NQoS AODV).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A cross-layer routing approach for MANET-assisted IoT applications
    Quy, Vu Khanh
    Van Anh, Dang
    Ban, Nguyen Tien
    Quy, Nguyen Minh
    Jeon, Gwanggil
    TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 35 (04)
  • [42] A SURVEY ON CROSS LAYER ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MANET
    Manpreet
    Malhotra, Jyoteesh
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH (ICAETR), 2014,
  • [43] A Trust Based MANET Routing Protocol
    Rahman, Mohammad Ghulam
    17TH ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (APCC 2011), 2011, : 542 - 547
  • [44] A Smart Collaborative Routing Protocol for Delay Sensitive Applications in Industrial IoT
    Zhu, Mingqiang
    Chang, Liu
    Wang, Nan
    You, Ilsun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 20413 - 20427
  • [45] Restoration and fuzzy logic-based formation of multipath routing protocol in MANET
    Amrendra Singh Yadav
    Nitin Rakesh
    Ankit Vidyarthi
    Rabindra Kumar Barik
    Ayushi Singhal
    Dharmender Singh Kushwaha
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2023, 14 : 117 - 132
  • [46] Restoration and fuzzy logic-based formation of multipath routing protocol in MANET
    Yadav, Amrendra Singh
    Rakesh, Nitin
    Vidyarthi, Ankit
    Barik, Rabindra Kumar
    Singhal, Ayushi
    Kushwaha, Dharmender Singh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (SUPPL 1) : 117 - 132
  • [47] Adaptive reliable and congestion control routing protocol for MANET
    R. Vadivel
    V. Murali Bhaskaran
    Wireless Networks, 2017, 23 : 819 - 829
  • [48] Adaptive reliable and congestion control routing protocol for MANET
    Vadivel, R.
    Bhaskaran, V. Murali
    WIRELESS NETWORKS, 2017, 23 (03) : 819 - 829
  • [49] An AODV based QoS routing protocol for delay sensitive applications in mobile Ad Hoc networks
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Sarje, Anil K.
    Misra, Manoj
    Journal of Digital Information Management, 2010, 8 (05): : 303 - 314
  • [50] A REVIEW ON CLUSTER BASED GROUP ADAPTIVE HYBRID ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR MOBILITY IN MANET
    Punitha, P.
    Shanthini, J.
    Karthik, S.
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT-COMPUTING AND NETWORK SECURITY (ICSNS 2018), 2018, : 233 - 238