Neural correlates of a default response in a delayed Go/No-Go task

被引:19
|
作者
Kalenscher, T
Güntürkün, O
Calabrese, P
Gehlen, W
Kalt, T
Diekamp, B
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Biopsychol, Inst Cognit Neurosci, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
working memory; electrophysiology; NCL; PFC; delayed matching to sample; Go/No-Go; default response; mandibulation; pigeons;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.2005.86-04
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Working memory, the ability to temporarily retain task-relevant information across a delay, is frequently investigated using delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) or delayed Go/No-Go tasks (DGNG). In DMTS tasks, sample cues instruct the animal which type of response has to be executed at the end of a delay. Typically, performance decreases with increasing delay duration, indicating that working memory fades across a delay. However, no such performance decrease has been found when the sample cues exist of present vs. absent stimuli, suggesting that pigeons do not rely on working memory, but seem to respond by default in those trials. We trained 3 pigeons in a DGNG task and found a similar default response pattern: The diverging slopes of the retention functions on correct Go and No-Go trials suggested that pigeons by default omitted their response following No-Go stimuli, but actively retained task-relevant information across the delay for successful responses on Go trials. We conducted single-cell recordings in the avian nidopallium caudolaterale, a structure comparable to the mammalian prefrontal cortex. On Go trials, many neurons displayed sustained elevated activity during the delay preceding the response, replicating previous findings and suggesting that task-relevant information was neurally represented and maintained across the delay. However, the same units did not show enhanced delay activity preceding correct response suppressions in No-Go trials. This activation-in activation pattern presumably constitutes a neural correlate of the default response strategy observed in the DGNG task.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 535
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Timing of response differentiation in human motor cortex during a speeded Go/No-Go task
    Bolton, David A. E.
    Vesia, Michael
    Lakhani, Bimal
    Staines, W. Richard
    McIlroy, William E.
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2014, 85 : 65 - 68
  • [42] Heritability of phase synchrony of brain oscillations induced by response inhibition in a Go/No-Go task
    Mueller, Viktor
    Anokhin, Andrey P.
    Lindenberger, Ulman
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2007, 37 (06) : 777 - 778
  • [43] Adaptive Strategies for the Elderly in Inhibiting Irrelevant and Conflict No-Go Trials while Performing the Go/No-Go Task
    Hsieh, Shulan
    Wu, Mengyao
    Tang, Chien-Hui
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 7
  • [44] Response inhibition in the parametric go/no-go task and its relation to impulsivity and subclinical psychopathy
    Weidacker, Kathrin
    Whiteford, Seb
    Boy, Frederic
    Johnston, Stephen J.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (03): : 473 - 487
  • [45] The neural correlates of cognitive control in bipolar I disorder: An fMRI study of medial frontal cortex activation during a Go/No-go task
    Welander-Vatn, Audun
    Jensen, Jimmy
    Otnaess, Mona K.
    Agartz, Ingrid
    Server, Andres
    Melle, Ingrid
    Andreassen, Ole A.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 549 : 51 - 56
  • [46] Intact neural activity during a Go/No-go task is associated with high global functioning in schizophrenia
    Araki, Tsuyoshi
    Kirihara, Kenji
    Koshiyama, Daisuke
    Nagai, Tatsuya
    Tada, Mariko
    Fukuda, Masato
    Kasai, Kiyoto
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2016, 70 (07) : 278 - 285
  • [47] Does chronic smoking affect performance on a go/no-go task?
    Silva, Gabriella M.
    Almeida, Natalia L.
    Souto, Jandirlly J. S.
    Rodrigues, Stephanye J.
    Fernandes, Thiago P.
    Santos, Natanael A.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (11) : 7636 - 7644
  • [48] Does chronic smoking affect performance on a go/no-go task?
    Gabriella M. Silva
    Natalia L. Almeida
    Jandirlly J. S. Souto
    Stephanye J. Rodrigues
    Thiago P. Fernandes
    Natanael A. Santos
    Current Psychology, 2022, 41 : 7636 - 7644
  • [49] Midsession Reversals of Go/No-Go Task Contingencies in Chickadees and Pigeons
    McMillan, Neil
    Sturdy, Christopher B.
    Spetch, Marcia L.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2014, 68 (04): : 269 - 269
  • [50] TRANSCRANIAL ULTRASOUND INFLUENCES BEHAVIOR AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY IN A GO/NO-GO TASK
    Forster, Andre
    Allen, John
    Rodrigues, Johannes
    Hewig, Johannes
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 : S44 - S44