Context Sensitive Technologies and Electronic Employee Monitoring: a Meta-Analytic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Backhaus, Nils [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth BAuA, Grp Changing World Work Human Factors & Ergon, Dortmund, Germany
关键词
context sensitivity; electronic monitoring; human-machine interaction; psychological demands; review; WORKPLACE SURVEILLANCE; PERFORMANCE; WORK; JOB; FAIRNESS; CONSEQUENCES; PERCEPTIONS; ANTECEDENTS; MANAGEMENT; STRESS;
D O I
10.1109/sii.2019.8700354
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Digitized, interconnected work environments become increasingly popular. It is assumed that these system support employees in their daily routine and reduce mental demand and stress at work. However, context-aware systems entail the potential for comprehensive electronic workplace monitoring. This contribution reviews the influence of electronic monitoring on outcome variables, such as performance, psychological stress and strain, work motivation, satisfaction and behavior. 85 studies have been identified and prepared both qualitatively and meta-analytically. There were heterogeneous findings for employee performance. Mild adverse effects of monitoring on perceived stress, mental demand, job motivation and satisfaction, as well as organizational trust and perceived control could be found. Significant design recommendations were made in order to increase acceptance and avoid adverse monitoring effects. Most of the studies were based on cross-sectional correlative or quasi-experimental survey designs. As a result, ascertained design knowledge requires more longitudinal studies and systematic interventions of electronic monitoring in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 553
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Displaced aggression: A meta-analytic review
    Miller, N
    Marcus-Newhall, A
    Pedersen, WC
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 1999, 25 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [32] A Meta-Analytic Review of Corridor Effectiveness
    Gilbert-Norton, Lynne
    Wilson, Ryan
    Stevens, John R.
    Beard, Karen H.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 660 - 668
  • [33] Are information asymmetry and sharing good, bad, or context dependent? A meta-analytic review
    Tong, Pui Ying
    Crosno, Jody L.
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 56 : 167 - 180
  • [34] Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review
    Harms, P. D.
    Crede, Marcus
    Tynan, Michael
    Leon, Matthew
    Jeung, Wonho
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01): : 178 - 194
  • [35] Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review
    Presson, PK
    Benassi, VA
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1996, 11 (03): : 493 - 510
  • [36] Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review
    Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer
    Markus Blut
    Sarah Hong Xiao
    Dhruv Grewal
    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48 : 384 - 404
  • [37] DEPRESSION AND IMMUNITY - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW
    HERBERT, TB
    COHEN, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 113 (03) : 472 - 486
  • [38] The generation effect: A meta-analytic review
    Bertsch, Sharon
    Pesta, Bryan J.
    Wiscott, Richard
    McDaniel, Mchael A.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2007, 35 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [39] Consumer confusion: A meta-analytic review
    Shahid, Shadma
    Maseeh, Haroon Iqbal
    Jebarajakirthy, Charles
    Sharma, Bhuvanesh Kumar
    Saha, Raiswa
    Gupta, Shubhi
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 192
  • [40] REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN META-ANALYTIC METHOD
    BANGERTDROWNS, RL
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 99 (03) : 388 - 399