In-vivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy:: Physical and clinical considerations

被引:58
|
作者
Waldhäusl, C
Wambersie, A
Pötter, R
Georg, D
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiobiol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Catholique Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
in-vivo dosimetry; semiconductor diodes; brachytherapy; ICRU reference points; gynaecology;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The study aimed to estimate the dosimetric uncertainty using diodes (PTW/Germany) for a high-dose rate Iridum-192 source under clinical conditions. Finally, the role of in-vivo dosimetry for cervix cancer patients was evaluated. Material and methods: First, diode calibration and factors influencing diode response were investigated and phantom studies compared doses measured and computed by the treatment planning system. Based on that, the uncertainty for diode measurements was estimated to be 7% (1 sigma). Secondly, 55 applications of patients with cervix carcinoma were evaluated. Doses in rectum and bladder were measured and compared to the computed doses and differences were calculated. If the differences exceeded 10% the corresponding shift in probe position was evaluated. Additionally, the in-vivo dosimetry data were compared to doses at the ICRU 38 [ICRU Report No. 38, dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynaecology. In: Chassagne D, Dutreix A, Almond P, Burgers J, Busch M, Joslin C editors. International commissioning on radiation units and measurements. Bethesda: 1985.] reference points for rectum and bladder. Results: In patients, in-vivo dosimetry resulted in differences between calculated and measured doses ranging from -31 to +90% (mean 11%) for the rectum and from -27 to +26% (mean 4%) for the bladder. Shifts in probe position of 2.5 mm for the rectal probe and 3.5 mm for the bladder probe caused dose differences exceeding 10%. The dose at the ICRU rectum reference point was underestimated by the calculated doses at probe position ranging from -61 to 156% (mean 29%). The dose to the ICRU bladder reference point was underestimated by the calculated dose ranging from 12 to 162% (mean 58%). Conclusion: The study shows that diode accuracy and reproducibility is sufficient for clinical applications. For accurate in-vivo dosimetry geometric conditions are of outmost importance. It is recommended that in-vivo dosimetry should be performed in addition to computation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 77 (2005) 310-317.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 317
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ROLE OF IN-VIVO DIODES DOSIMETRY FOR CRITICAL ORGAN DOSE EVALUATION IN HDR BRACHYTHERAPY OF CERVIX CANCER
    Hassouna, A.
    Bahadur, Y.
    Constantinescu, C.
    Ezzat, M.
    Naseem, H.
    Naga, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S401 - S402
  • [32] In-vivo film dosimetry indicates a role for model-based algorithms in HDR surface brachytherapy
    Aldelaijan, S.
    O'Farrell, D. A.
    Harris, T. C.
    Cormack, R. A.
    Seuntjens, J. P.
    Devic, S.
    Devlin, P. M.
    Buzurovic, I. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S1087 - S1088
  • [33] Characterization and Validation of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters for In-Vivo Dosimetry of HDR Gynecological Brachytherapy Treatments
    Hanna, J.
    Yaparpalvi, R.
    Kuo, H.
    Mehta, K.
    Tome, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [34] Real-Time MOSkin In-Vivo Rectal Dosimetry for TRUS Based HDR Prostate Brachytherapy
    Poder, J.
    Howie, A.
    Brown, R.
    Bucci, J.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    Enari, K.
    Schreiber, K.
    Carrara, M.
    Malouf, D.
    Cutajar, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E842 - E843
  • [35] Clinical implementation of dosimetry check, EPID based in-vivo dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Gilmore, M.
    Gunson, N.
    Furlong, C.
    Gately, A. M.
    Reilly, A. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S173 - S173
  • [36] In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice
    Fonseca, Gabriel P.
    Johansen, Jacob G.
    Smith, Ryan L.
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Beddar, Sam
    Kertzscher, Gustavo
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Tanderup, Kari
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 1 - 11
  • [37] Dose responses of a MOSFET detector for in-vivo dosimetry of clinical electron beams
    Tao, L
    Kalend, AM
    Rakfal, SM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 506 - 507
  • [38] An in-vivo dosimetry clinical decision model for adaptive radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Yang, Long
    Li, Zhenhao
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Hu, Weigang
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4043 - S4044
  • [39] In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: state of the art, available equipment and implementation in clinical routine
    Johansen, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S63 - S63
  • [40] Clinical implementation and rapid commissioning of an EPID based in-vivo dosimetry system
    Hanson, Ian M.
    Hansen, Vibeke N.
    Olaciregui-Ruiz, Igor
    van Herk, Marcel
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (19): : N171 - N179