Commissioning and validation of commercial deformable image registration software for adaptive contouring

被引:11
|
作者
Jamema, Swamidas V. [1 ]
Phurailatpam, Reena [1 ]
Paul, Siji N. [1 ]
Joshi, Kishore [1 ]
Deshpande, D. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tata Mem Hosp, ACTREC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Navi Mumbai 410210, Maharashtra, India
[2] Tata Mem Hosp, Tata Mem Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Bombay 400012, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Validation; Deformable image registration; Commissioning; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; PELVIS; LEVEL; NECK; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the commissioning and validation of deformable image registration(DIR) software for adaptive contouring. Methods: DIR (SmartAdapt (R) v13.6) was validated using two methods namely contour propagation accuracy and landmark tracking, using physical phantoms and clinical images of various disease sites. Five in-house made phantoms with various known deformations and a set of 10 virtual phantoms were used. Displacement in lateral, anterio-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction were evaluated for various organs and compared with the ground truth. Four clinical sites namely, brain (n=5), HN (n=9), cervix (n=18) and prostate (n=23) were used. Organs were manually delineated by a radiation oncologist, compared with the deformable image registration (DIR) generated contours. 3D slicer v4.5.0.1 was used to analyze Dice Similarity Co-efficient (DSC), shift in centre of mass (COM) and Hausdorff distances Hf-95%/avg. Results: Mean (SD) DSC, Hf-95% (mm), Hf-avg (mm) and COM of all the phantoms 1-5 were 0.84 (0.2) mm, 5.1 (7.4) mm, 1.6 (2.2) mm, and 1.6 (0.2) mm respectively. Phantom-5 had the largest deformation as compared to phantoms 1-4, and hence had suboptimal indices. The virtual phantom resulted in consistent results for all the ROIs investigated. Contours propagated for brain patients were better with a high DSC score (0.91 (0.04)) as compared to other sites (HN: 0.84, prostate: 0.81 and cervix 0.77). A similar trend was seen in other indices too. The accuracy of propagated contours is limited for complex deformations that include large volume and shape change of bladder and rectum respectively. Visual validation of the propagated contours is recommended for clinical implementation. Conclusion: The DIR algorithm was commissioned and validated for adaptive contouring.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance validation of deformable image registration in the pelvic region
    Zambrano, V.
    Furtado, H.
    Fabri, D.
    Luetgendorf-Caucig, C.
    Gora, J.
    Stock, M.
    Mayer, R.
    Birkfellner, W.
    Georg, D.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 : 120 - 128
  • [22] Role and validation of deformable image registration in clinical practice
    van Herk, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S275 - S276
  • [23] Validation of three deformable image registration algorithms for the thorax
    Latifi, Kujtim
    Zhang, Geoffrey
    Stawicki, Marnix
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Dekker, Andre
    Forster, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (01): : 19 - 30
  • [24] Evaluating the Accuracy of Commercial Deformable Image Registration Software for Real Patient Images Using Anthropomorphic Modeling
    Guo, B.
    Qiu, L.
    Donaghue, J. D.
    Hsu, S. H.
    Xia, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E544 - E544
  • [25] Validation of a commercial deformable image registration for surface-guided radiotherapy using an ad hoc-developed deformable phantom
    Pallotta, Stefania
    Kugele, Malin
    Redapi, Laura
    Ceberg, Sofie
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (12) : 6310 - 6318
  • [26] Validation and commissioning of AI contouring tools
    Green, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S277 - S277
  • [27] Validation of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Head and Neck Adaptive Radiotherapy in Routine Clinical Setting
    Zhang, L.
    Wang, Z.
    Shi, C.
    Pi, Y.
    Long, T.
    Luo, W.
    Wang, F.
    Chen, Z.
    Xu, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3342 - 3342
  • [28] Contour guided deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy
    Bosma, L.
    Ries, M.
    de Senneville, B. Denis
    Raaymakers, B.
    Zachiu, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1260 - S1261
  • [29] Validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in the abdomen, thorax, and pelvis in a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system
    Velec, Michael
    Moseley, Joanne L.
    Svensson, Stina
    Hardemark, Bjorn
    Jaffray, David A.
    Brock, Kristy K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (07) : 3407 - 3417
  • [30] Multi-Institutional Validation Study of Commercially Available Deformable Image Registration Software for Thoracic Images
    Kadoya, N.
    Nakajima, Y.
    Saito, M.
    Miyabe, Y.
    Kurooka, M.
    Kito, S.
    Sasaki, M.
    Fujita, Y.
    Arai, K.
    Tani, K.
    Yagi, M.
    Wakita, A.
    Tohyama, N.
    Jingu, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3736 - 3736