Impact of Response to Prior Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Second-Line Therapy: Implications for Trial Design

被引:17
|
作者
Pond, Gregory R. [1 ]
Bellmunt, Joaquim [2 ]
Fougeray, Ronan [3 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [4 ,5 ]
Qu, Angela Q. [4 ,5 ]
Niegisch, Guenter [6 ]
Albers, Peter [6 ]
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe [7 ]
Salhi, Yacine [3 ]
Galsky, Matthew D. [8 ]
Agarwal, Neeraj [9 ]
Necchi, Andrea [10 ]
Sonpavde, Guru [11 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Univ Hosp Mar IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Inst Rech Pierre Fabre, Boulogne, France
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[7] Univ Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
[8] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Tisch Canc Ctr Inst, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[10] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[11] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
Advanced urothelial carcinoma; Prognostic factors; Response to prior chemotherapy; Second-line therapy; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; PHASE-III TRIAL; PLATINUM-CONTAINING REGIMEN; BLADDER-CANCER PATIENTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PACLITAXEL; TRACT; GEMCITABINE; VINFLUNINE; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2013.04.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a retrospective analysis of pooled phase II trials, best prior response in patients receiving prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease did not confer an independent prognostic impact with second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Background: The prognostic impact of response to prior chemotherapy independent of performance status (PS), hemoglobin (Hb), liver metastasis (LM), and time from prior chemotherapy (TFPC) in the context of second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unknown. Methods: Six phase II trials evaluating second-line therapy (n = 504) were pooled. Patients who received prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible for analysis if Hb, LM, PS, and TFPC were available. Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 to first-line therapy was recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of registration using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 275 patients were evaluable for analysis. Patients received gemcitabine-paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel, pazopanib, docetaxel plus vandetanib/placebo, or vinflunine (2 trials). Those with prior response (n = 111) had a median OS of 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-9.4), compared with 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.0-6.6) for those without prior response (n = 164). Those with prior response had a median PFS of 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.0) compared with 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.8) in patients without response. Multivariable analysis did not reveal a significant independent impact of prior response on PFS and OS. Conclusions: Best prior response in patients receiving prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease did not confer an independent prognostic impact with second-line therapy for advanced UC. Given that the setting of prior chemotherapy (metastatic or perioperative) has not appeared significant in a prior study, patients who received prior chemotherapy in perioperative or metastatic settings may be enrolled in the same second-line trial stratified for PS, Hb, LM, and TFPC.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of response to prior chemotherapy (RTPC) on outcomes in second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC): Implications for trial design.
    Pond, Gregory Russell
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Fougeray, Ronan
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Qu, Angela Q.
    Salhi, Yacine
    Niegisch, Guenter
    Albers, Peter
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    Galsky, Matt D.
    Necchi, Andrea
    Sonpavde, Guru
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [2] Impact of the Number of Prior Lines of Therapy and Prior Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients Receiving Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Implications for Trial Design
    Pond, G. R.
    Bellmunt, J.
    Rosenberg, J. E.
    Bajorin, D. F.
    Regazzi, A. M.
    Choueiri, T. K.
    Qu, A. Q.
    Niegisch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Necchi, A.
    Di Lorenzo, G.
    Fougeray, R.
    Wong, Y. -N.
    Sridhar, S. S.
    Ko, Y. -J.
    Milowsky, M. I.
    Galsky, M. D.
    Sonpavde, G.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2015, 13 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [3] Time from prior chemotherapy (TFPC) as a prognostic factor in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) receiving second-line systemic therapy.
    Pond, Gregory Russell
    Sonpavde, Guru
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Qu, Angela Q.
    Vaughn, David J.
    Fougeray, Ronan
    Niegisch, Guenter
    Albers, Peter
    Wong, Yu-Ning
    Ko, Yoo-Joung
    Sridhar, Srikala S.
    Galsky, Matt D.
    Petrylak, Daniel Peter
    Beer, Tomasz M.
    Stadler, Walter Michael
    O'Donnell, Peter H.
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Rosenberg, Jonathan E.
    Molins, Joaquim Bellmunt
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [4] Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Bellmunt, J.
    de Wit, R.
    Vaughn, D. J.
    Fradet, Y.
    Lee, J. -L.
    Fong, L.
    Vogelzang, N. J.
    Climent, M. A.
    Petrylak, D. P.
    Choueiri, T. K.
    Necchi, A.
    Gerritsen, W.
    Gurney, H.
    Quinn, D. I.
    Culine, S.
    Sternberg, C. N.
    Mai, Y.
    Poehlein, C. H.
    Perini, R. F.
    Bajorin, D. F.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (11): : 1015 - 1026
  • [5] Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma
    Douchet, G.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2017, 19 (5-6) : 205 - 206
  • [6] PROGNOSTIC STRATIFICATION OF ADVANCED UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA (UC) RECEIVING SECOND-LINE SYSTEMIC THERAPY INCLUDING TIME FROM PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY (TFPC) AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR
    Sonpavde, G.
    Pond, G. R.
    Choueiri, T. K.
    Fougeray, R.
    Niegisch, G.
    Wong, Y.
    Sridhar, S. S.
    Stadler, W. M.
    Sternberg, C. N.
    Bellmunt, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 265 - 266
  • [7] Combination of Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Suyama, Takahito
    Ueda, Takeshi
    Fukasawa, Satoshi
    Imamura, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Kazuyoshi
    Miyasaka, Kyoko
    Sazuka, Tomokazu
    Egoshi, Ken-ichi
    Nihei, Naoki
    Hamano, Masaaki
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    Maruoka, Masayuki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 39 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [8] Paclitaxel plus Doxorubicin Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Pretreated with Platinum plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy
    Kaya, Ali O.
    Coskun, Ugur
    Ozkan, Metin
    Sevinc, Alper
    Yilmaz, Ahmet U.
    Gumus, Mahmut
    Unal, Olcun U.
    Ozdemir, Nuriye Y.
    Alici, Suleyman
    Berk, Veli
    Degerli, Hatice
    Oner, Mehmet K.
    Ozturk, Cemil
    Kefeli, Umut
    Camci, Celalettin
    ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 35 (10): : 576 - 580
  • [9] Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of second-line combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma
    Yuji Takeyama
    Minoru Kato
    Chikako Nishihara
    Takeshi Yamasaki
    Taro Iguchi
    Satoshi Tamada
    Katsuyuki Kuratsukuri
    Tatsuya Nakatani
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 944 - 950
  • [10] Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of second-line combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma
    Takeyama, Yuji
    Kato, Minoru
    Nishihara, Chikako
    Yamasaki, Takeshi
    Iguchi, Taro
    Tamada, Satoshi
    Kuratsukuri, Katsuyuki
    Nakatani, Tatsuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (05) : 944 - 950