Combination of Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

被引:49
|
作者
Suyama, Takahito
Ueda, Takeshi [1 ]
Fukasawa, Satoshi
Imamura, Yusuke
Nakamura, Kazuyoshi [2 ]
Miyasaka, Kyoko
Sazuka, Tomokazu
Egoshi, Ken-ichi
Nihei, Naoki [2 ]
Hamano, Masaaki
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [2 ]
Maruoka, Masayuki
机构
[1] Chiba Canc Ctr, Div Urol, Chuo Ku, Chiba 2608717, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Chiba, Japan
关键词
gemcitabine; paclitaxel; second-line chemotherapy; advanced urothelial carcinoma; TRANSITIONAL-CELL-CARCINOMA; PHASE-II TRIAL; COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; CISPLATIN-BASED THERAPY; LONG-TERM-SURVIVAL; BLADDER-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SALVAGE TREATMENT; IFOSFAMIDE; METHOTREXATE;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyp003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of the gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination regimen as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who have previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy for the metastatic disease. Thirty-three patients with advanced or metastatic UC who had received platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with an outpatient gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination regimen. A dose of 180 mg/m(2) paclitaxel was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, and 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine was administered by IV on Days 1, 8 and 15.The course was repeated every 28 days. Patients were evaluated after every 2 cycles of therapy using computed tomography. Of the 33 patients enrolled in this study, 30 could be evaluated to determine treatment efficacy; 10 had an objective response [overall response rate: 33.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.2-51.2%]. The median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6 months). The chemotherapy sensitivity differed with disease site. The response rates of lung and bone metastases were 27% and 14%, and the progressive disease (PD) rates of lung and bone metastases were 13% and 14%, respectively. On the other hand, the response rate of liver metastasis was 14%, and its PD rate was 57%. None of the patients (n = 3) with adrenal metastasis responded to this regimen. Toxicities were mild, and no life-threatening complications occurred. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy is a tolerable and active regimen for patients with advanced UC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 250
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
    Matsumoto, Kazumasa
    Irie, Akira
    Satoh, Takefumi
    Okazaki, Miyoko
    Iwamura, Masatsugu
    Baba, Shiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (11) : 1000 - 1004
  • [2] Gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma -: Editorial comment
    Nakagawa, Masayuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (11) : 1004 - 1004
  • [3] Phase II Study of Second-line Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, and Cisplatin for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Ogawa, Masahiro
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Inoue, Toru
    Numao, Noboru
    Yuasa, Takeshi
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Fukui, Iwao
    Yonese, Junji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (03) : 1613 - 1618
  • [4] THE EFFICIENCY OF SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH GEMCITABINE AND PACLITAXEL FOR ADVANCED UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA RESISTANT TO CISPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY
    Nishihara, Chikako
    Kuratsukuri, Katsuyuki
    Iguchi, Taro
    Tamada, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Tomoaki
    Uchida, Junji
    Kawashima, Hidenori
    Nakatani, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E765 - E765
  • [5] Paclitaxel plus Doxorubicin Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Pretreated with Platinum plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy
    Kaya, Ali O.
    Coskun, Ugur
    Ozkan, Metin
    Sevinc, Alper
    Yilmaz, Ahmet U.
    Gumus, Mahmut
    Unal, Olcun U.
    Ozdemir, Nuriye Y.
    Alici, Suleyman
    Berk, Veli
    Degerli, Hatice
    Oner, Mehmet K.
    Ozturk, Cemil
    Kefeli, Umut
    Camci, Celalettin
    ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 35 (10): : 576 - 580
  • [6] Second-line nab-paclitaxel for advanced urothelial carcinoma
    Sarah Payton
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2013, 10 (8) : 431 - 431
  • [7] Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Resistant to First-Line Therapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin
    Terakawa, Tomoaki
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Yokoyama, Naoki
    Miyazaki, Akira
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Takaaki
    Fujisawa, Masato
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [8] The Combination of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Paclitaxel as Salvage Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    Hirata, Takeshi
    Hanamoto, Masanori
    Ogura, Kazuma
    Hayashi, Nobuki
    Takamura, Kosuke
    Edamura, Kohei
    Ebara, Shin
    Saika, Takashi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2018, 72 (02) : 175 - 179
  • [9] The effects of paclitaxel and carboplatin as a second-line chemotherapy against advanced urothelial carcinoma after failure of first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin therapy
    Terakawa, Tomoaki
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Inoue, Takaaki
    Nakano, Yuzo
    Hinata, Nobuyuki
    Harada, Kenichi
    Furukawa, Junya
    Nishikawa, Masayuki
    Miyazaki, Akira
    Imai, Satoshi
    Momozono, Hiroyuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 40 - 40
  • [10] Gemcitabine and docetaxel, an effective second-line chemotherapy for lung metastasis of urothelial carcinoma
    Taku Naiki
    Noriyasu Kawai
    Yoshihiro Hashimoto
    Takehiko Okamura
    Ryosuke Ando
    Takahiro Yasui
    Atsushi Okada
    Toshiki Etani
    Keiichi Tozawa
    Kenjiro Kohri
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014, 19 : 516 - 522