How do Undergraduate Students Reason about Ethical and Algorithmic Decision-Making?

被引:4
|
作者
Aggarwal, Ashish [1 ]
Ranjan, Saurabh [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Engn Educ, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
CS1; algorithmic decision making; ethics; computational reasoning; trolley problem;
D O I
10.1145/3478431.3499412
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
As the effectiveness of algorithms to make decisions improves and as the use of algorithms in domains, which can have a significant impact in determining one's life prospects increases, it is important to understand undergraduate students' perceptions of algorithmic decision making and reasoning behind that perception. We conducted a study to understand engineering students' perception about algorithmic decision making in two different scenarios using a trolley problem at the end of an introductory programming course. The motivation to conduct this study was to gain insights on how they reason about the ethical use of algorithms. Data of eighty-two undergraduate engineering students was analyzed to not only understand their decisions in two different contexts but also their qualitative reasoning behind their decisions. This paper presents a thematic analysis of these decisions and how they differed in the two contexts. Further, classification of their reasoning into different known philosophical frameworks is discussed, which helps in understanding the major underpinnings of these decisions. We believe that the results of this study can help educators understand how students reason about algorithms which may influence how 'ethics' as a topic is integrated in computer science courses, especially in introductory programming courses.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 494
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How to use algorithmic decision-making to promote inclusiveness in organizations
    David De Cremer
    Leander De Schutter
    AI and Ethics, 2021, 1 (4): : 563 - 567
  • [22] How decision-making about euthanasia for animals is taught to Australasian veterinary students
    Littlewood, K. E.
    Beausoleil, N. J.
    Stafford, K. J.
    Stephens, C.
    Collins, T.
    Quain, A.
    Hazel, S.
    Lloyd, JK. F.
    Mallia, C.
    Richards, L.
    Wedler, N. K.
    Zito, S.
    AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 99 (08) : 334 - 343
  • [23] How to Use AI Ethically for Ethical Decision-Making
    Demaree-Cotton, Joanna
    Earp, Brian D.
    Savulescu, Julian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (07): : 1 - 3
  • [24] ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
    TOFFLER, BL
    FORTUNE, 1987, 115 (03) : 15 - 15
  • [25] Ethical and legal considerations of artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making in personalized pricing
    Gerlick, Joshua A.
    Liozu, Stephan M.
    JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 19 (02) : 85 - 98
  • [26] Ethical and legal considerations of artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making in personalized pricing
    Joshua A. Gerlick
    Stephan M. Liozu
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2020, 19 : 85 - 98
  • [27] Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities
    Lim, Hazel Si Min
    Taeihagh, Araz
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [28] Information and decision-making regarding food choices by undergraduate students
    Johnson, Sara E.
    McEligot, Archana J.
    Cullin, Jennifer
    Alano, Ryan
    McMahan, Shari
    Cunningham, Stephanie
    Sandoval, Nicole
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [29] Nursing students' experience of ethical problems and use of ethical decision-making models
    Cameron, ME
    Schaffer, M
    Park, HA
    NURSING ETHICS, 2001, 8 (05) : 432 - 447
  • [30] Participation in algorithmic administrative decision-making
    Ramotti, Camilla
    BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, 2024, (03): : 455 - 476