Left Ventricular Lead Electrical Delay Is a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

被引:35
|
作者
Roubicek, Tomas [1 ]
Wichterle, Dan [2 ,3 ]
Kucera, Pavel [1 ]
Nedbal, Pavel [1 ]
Kupec, Jindrich [1 ]
Sedlakova, Jana [1 ]
Cerny, Jan [1 ]
Stros, Jan [1 ]
Kautzner, Josef [2 ,3 ]
Polasek, Rostislav [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Liberec, Dept Cardiol, Liberec, Czech Republic
[2] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Tech Univ Liberec, Inst Hlth Studies, Liberec, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
bundle-branch block; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; hospitalization; mortality; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Electric left ventricular lead position, assessed by the electric delay from the beginning of the QRS complex to the local LV electrogram (QLV), was found in previous studies to be a strong predictor of short-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We hypothesized that suboptimum electric position of the left ventricular lead is associated with an excess of heart failure events and mortality. Methods and Results We analyzed the clinical outcome of patients with left bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy at our institution during 9 years. Baseline clinical characteristics, QLV/QRS duration (QLV ratio) at cardiac resynchronization therapy implant, and data about heart failure hospitalization and mode of death were collected in 329 patients who were followed for a period of 3.31.9 years. Of them, 83 were hospitalized for heart failure and 83 died. Event rates for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, noncardiac mortality, heart failure mortality, and sudden death were 25.2%, 14.9%, 10.3%, 12.2%, and 2.1%, respectively. Patients with a QLV ratio 0.70 had significantly worse event-free survival for all study end pointshazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.4; P=0.05 for heart failure hospitalization; hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.5; P=0.001 for heart failure mortality; hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.7; P=0.01 for cardiac mortality; and hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.7; P=0.01 for all-cause mortality. In multivariable analysis, QLV ratio 0.70 remained associated with all study end points. Conclusions Electric left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients was a significant predictor of heart failure hospitalization and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1121
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony Can Lead to Reverse Ventricular Rotation as a Novel Predictor of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Oe, Yoko
    Nishigami, Kazuhiro
    Koyama, Junjiro
    Honda, Toshihiro
    Nakao, Koichi
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S770 - S770
  • [22] Impacted left ventricular lead technique in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chan, Ngai Yin
    Lo, Ying Keung
    EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (07): : 531 - 532
  • [23] Thoracoscopic Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Jeong, Dong Seop
    Park, Pyo Won
    Lee, Young Tak
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Kim, June Soo
    On, Young Keun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 27 (12) : 1595 - 1597
  • [24] Importance of left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bleeker, Gabe B.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (10) : 1182 - 1183
  • [25] The Role of Electrical Delay (QLV) to Predict Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Gold, Michael R.
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Yu, Yinghong
    Meyer, Timothy E.
    Seth, Milan
    Tchou, Patrick J.
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [26] Left ventricular markers of mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Hasselberg, Nina E.
    Haugaa, Kristina H.
    Bernard, Anne
    Ribe, Margareth P.
    Kongsgaard, Erik
    Donal, Erwan
    Edvardsen, Thor
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 17 (03) : 343 - 350
  • [27] Prognostic value of interventricular lead electrical delay in patients under cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Mendez Zurita, F.
    Alonso M, C.
    Rodriguez F, E.
    Guerra R, J. M.
    Rodriguez G, M.
    Alvarez, D.
    Vinolas P, X.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 97 - 98
  • [28] Outcome of Patients Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead
    Bencardino, Gianluigi
    Di Monaco, Antonio
    Russo, Eleonora
    Colizzi, Cristian
    Perna, Francesco
    Pelargonio, Gemma
    Narducci, Maria Lucia
    Gabrielli, Francesca Augusta
    Lanza, Gaetano Antonio
    Rebuzzi, Antonio Giuseppe
    Crea, Filippo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (03) : 613 - 618
  • [29] Optimal left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in postmyocardial infarction patients
    Muto, Carmine
    Solimene, Francesco
    Russo, Vincenzo
    Nigro, Gerardo
    Rago, Anna
    Chianese, Raffaele
    Chiariello, Paola
    Ciardiello, Carmine
    Caliendo, Luigi
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (03) : 215 - 224
  • [30] Electrical Delay in Apically Positioned Left Ventricular Leads and Clinical Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kandala, Jagdesh
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    Altman, Robert K.
    Bose, Abhishek
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Mela, Theofanie
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 182 - 187