Left Ventricular Lead Electrical Delay Is a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

被引:35
|
作者
Roubicek, Tomas [1 ]
Wichterle, Dan [2 ,3 ]
Kucera, Pavel [1 ]
Nedbal, Pavel [1 ]
Kupec, Jindrich [1 ]
Sedlakova, Jana [1 ]
Cerny, Jan [1 ]
Stros, Jan [1 ]
Kautzner, Josef [2 ,3 ]
Polasek, Rostislav [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Liberec, Dept Cardiol, Liberec, Czech Republic
[2] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Tech Univ Liberec, Inst Hlth Studies, Liberec, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
bundle-branch block; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; hospitalization; mortality; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Electric left ventricular lead position, assessed by the electric delay from the beginning of the QRS complex to the local LV electrogram (QLV), was found in previous studies to be a strong predictor of short-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We hypothesized that suboptimum electric position of the left ventricular lead is associated with an excess of heart failure events and mortality. Methods and Results We analyzed the clinical outcome of patients with left bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy at our institution during 9 years. Baseline clinical characteristics, QLV/QRS duration (QLV ratio) at cardiac resynchronization therapy implant, and data about heart failure hospitalization and mode of death were collected in 329 patients who were followed for a period of 3.31.9 years. Of them, 83 were hospitalized for heart failure and 83 died. Event rates for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, noncardiac mortality, heart failure mortality, and sudden death were 25.2%, 14.9%, 10.3%, 12.2%, and 2.1%, respectively. Patients with a QLV ratio 0.70 had significantly worse event-free survival for all study end pointshazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.4; P=0.05 for heart failure hospitalization; hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.5; P=0.001 for heart failure mortality; hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.7; P=0.01 for cardiac mortality; and hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.7; P=0.01 for all-cause mortality. In multivariable analysis, QLV ratio 0.70 remained associated with all study end points. Conclusions Electric left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients was a significant predictor of heart failure hospitalization and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1121
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Fan, Dah
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Alabiad, Chrisfouad R.
    Taub, Cynthia
    Reddy, Vivek
    Mansour, Moussa
    Picard, MichaeL H.
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Mela, Theofanie
    HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (11) : 1285 - 1292
  • [2] Left Ventricular Lead Position and Nonspecific Conduction Delay Are Predictors of Mortality in Patients During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Prochnau, Dirk
    Kuehnert, Helmut
    Heinke, Matthias
    Figulla, Hans R.
    Surber, Ralf
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (03) : 363 - 368
  • [3] The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gold, Michael R.
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Yu, Yinghong
    Meyer, Timothy E.
    Seth, Milan
    Tchou, Patrick J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (20) : 2516 - 2524
  • [4] The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on AV optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gold, Michael R.
    Yu, Yinghong
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Stein, Kenneth M.
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    Meyer, Timothy E.
    Seth, Milan
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (07) : 988 - 993
  • [5] Left Ventricular Stimulation With Electrical Latency Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Yagishita, Daigo
    Yagishita, Yoshimi
    Kataoka, Shohei
    Yazaki, Kyoichiro
    Kanai, Miwa
    Ejima, Koichiro
    Shoda, Morio
    Hagiwara, Nobuhisa
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (06) : 796 - 805
  • [6] Interlead Distance and Left Ventricular Lead Electrical Delay Predict Reverse Remodeling During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Merchant, Faisal M.
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Nandigam, K. Veena
    Mulligan, Lawrence J.
    Blendea, Dan
    Riedl, Lindsay
    McCarty, David
    Orencole, Mary
    Picard, Michael H.
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (05): : 575 - 582
  • [7] Longer inter-lead electrical delay is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with presumed optima left ventricular lead position
    Sommer, Anders
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Norgaard, Bjarne Linde
    Stephansen, Charlotte
    Poutsen, Steen Hvitfeldt
    Kristensen, Jens
    Gerdes, Christian
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (10): : 1630 - 1637
  • [8] The anatomic and electrical location of the left ventricular lead predicts ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    Altman, Robert K.
    Orencole, Mary
    Barrett, Conor D.
    Mela, Theofanie
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2013, 10 (05) : 668 - 675
  • [9] Epicardial left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Fedorco, Marian
    Bulava, Alan
    Santavy, Petr
    Taborsky, Milos
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 35 : 34 - 39
  • [10] Ventricular electrical delay as a predictor of arrhythmias in patients with cardiac resynchronization implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    Elsaid, Ossama
    Gulati, Vinay
    Tecson, Kristen
    Friedman, Meir
    Kluger, Jeffrey
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2018, 52 (06) : 356 - 361