Reconciling Life Cycle Environmental Impacts with Ecosystem Services: A Management Perspective on Agricultural Land Use

被引:13
|
作者
Tang, Longlong [1 ]
Hayashi, Kiyotada [1 ]
Kohyama, Kazunori [1 ]
Leon, Ai [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Agr & Food Res Org, Inst Agroenvironm Sci, 3-1-3 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058604, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Energy Sci, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2018年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
agricultural product system; characterization factor; ecosystem service; land use; life cycle impact assessment; management practice; DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; DECISION-MAKING; EUROPEAN-UNION; RICE FIELDS; BIODIVERSITY; WATER; LCA; INDICATORS; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su10030630
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impacts on ecosystem services that are related to agricultural land use greatly differ depending on management practices employed. This study aimed to reveal issues associated with evaluating ecosystem services related to land use at the management level during life cycle assessment (LCA) and to consider future challenges. Firstly, a relationship between agricultural ecosystem services and management practices was outlined. Then, a survey was performed to disclose the current status of assessment of impact of land use in agricultural LCA case studies that compared between different management practices. In addition, this study also investigated how management practices have been differently considered by factors that characterize ecosystem services that are related to land use. The results show that the number of agricultural LCA cases where land use impacts instead of land areas were assessed was still small. The results of limited LCA case studies, which using factors could differentiate between various management practices, suggest that although organic farming methods have been employed over large land areas, lower impact may be caused by agricultural land use. For factors developed in existing research, services related to soil quality, and some of the regulatory services were considered, those unique to agriculture were missing. Although most of factors were calculated at levels of intensity or land use type, some of them were based on a process-based model that could consider management practices. In the future, factors that characterize the impacts of land use on ecosystem services, such as carbon storage and erosion prevention, will need to be calculated at the management level. For ecosystem services, such as habitat conservation and pollination, further efforts in accumulating evaluation case studies that collect and accumulate foreground data are important.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coupled impacts of climate and land use changes on regional ecosystem services
    Sun, Lin
    Yu, Huajun
    Sun, Mingxing
    Wang, Yutao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [22] Decadal changes in land use and land cover: impacts and their influence on urban ecosystem services
    Nayak, Deeksha
    Shukla, Anoop Kumar
    Devi, Nandineni Rama
    AQUA-WATER INFRASTRUCTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND SOCIETY, 2024, 73 (01) : 57 - 72
  • [23] Quantifying Land Use/Land Cover and Landscape Pattern Changes and Impacts on Ecosystem Services
    Zhao, Qingjian
    Wen, Zuomin
    Chen, Shulin
    Ding, Sheng
    Zhang, Minxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [24] Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions
    Fang, Zhou
    Ding, Tonghui
    Chen, Junyu
    Xue, Shi
    Zhou, Qin
    Wang, Yingdi
    Wang, Yixin
    Huang, Zhongde
    Yang, Shiliang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 831
  • [25] Impacts of land-use management on ecosystem services and biodiversity: an agent-based modelling approach
    Habib, Thomas J.
    Heckbert, Scott
    Wilson, Jeffrey J.
    Vandenbroeck, Andrew J. K.
    Cranston, Jerome
    Farr, Daniel R.
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [26] Assessing land use and flood management impacts on ecosystem services in a river landscape (Upper Danube, Germany)
    Stammel, Barbara
    Fischer, Christine
    Cyffka, Bernd
    Albert, Christian
    Damm, Christian
    Dehnhardt, Alexandra
    Fischer, Helmut
    Foeckler, Francis
    Gerstner, Lars
    Hoffmann, Tim G.
    Iwanowski, Janette
    Kasperidus, Hans D.
    Linnemann, Kathrin
    Mehl, Dietmar
    Podschun, Simone A.
    Rayanov, Marin
    Ritz, Stephanie
    Rumm, Andrea
    Scholz, Mathias
    Schulz-Zunkel, Christiane
    Thiele, Julia
    Venohr, Markus
    von Haaren, Christina
    Pusch, Martin T.
    Gelhaus, Marion
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 37 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [27] Integrating ecosystem services and life cycle assessment: a framework accounting for local and global (socio-)environmental impacts
    Sue Ellen Taelman
    Laura V. De Luca Peña
    Nils Préat
    Till M. Bachmann
    Katrien Van der Biest
    Joachim Maes
    Jo Dewulf
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 99 - 115
  • [28] Integrating ecosystem services and life cycle assessment: a framework accounting for local and global (socio-)environmental impacts
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Pena, Laura V. De Luca
    Preat, Nils
    Bachmann, Till M.
    van der Biest, Katrien
    Maes, Joachim
    Dewulf, Jo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (01): : 99 - 115
  • [29] Environmental impacts of the transition to automated vehicles: A life cycle perspective
    Obaid, Lubna
    Alattieh, Sara A.
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Hamad, Khaled
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 38
  • [30] Environmental Impacts of Egg Production from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Guillaume, Aurore
    Hubatova-Vackova, Anna
    Koci, Vladimir
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):