Macrophage polarization in kidney transplant patients

被引:2
|
作者
Devraj, Vijaya Madhuri [1 ]
Kalidindi, Karthik [1 ]
Guditi, Swarnalatha [1 ]
Uppin, Megha [2 ]
Taduri, Gangadhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Nizams Inst Med Sci NIMS, Dept Nephrol, Hyderabad 500082, Telangana, India
[2] Nizams Inst Med Sci NIMS, Dept Pathol, Hyderabad 500082, Telangana, India
关键词
Macrophage polarization; Graft dysfunction; Stable graft function; Kidney transplantation; Transplant rejection; CHRONIC REJECTION; PLASTICITY; EXPRESSION; MARKER; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trim.2022.101717
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Macrophages can oscillate between two functionally distinct states: proinflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2. Classically- activated M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and IL-6), which ares associated with graft dysfunction/rejections. In contrast, alternatively-activated macrophages M2 produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) that are involved in host defense, tissue repair/remodeling, debris scavenging, and immune regulation, thereby helps to improve long-term graft survival. Methods: In this study, we have identified graft dysfunction or rejection by biopsies using immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was used to detect M1 (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and M2 (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+) macrophages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure a panel of cytokines. Results: Histological analysis of the kidney transplants (n = 30) was used to distinguish those with acute/chronic allograft rejection (n = 15) from those with stable kidney function (n = 15). Flow cytometry results showed that patients with graft rejection exhibited macrophages with decreased expression (33.28%) of M2 macrophage markers (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and reduced production of IL-10 (as detected using ELISA). However, 71.33% of the macrophages were found to have M1 markers (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+; p = 0.002) and produced proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and IL-6) by ELISA (p = 0.001) when compared with the healthy control group. In contrast, stable kidney transplants had 65.58% M2 and 27.66% M1 macrophages (p = 0.03) and produced IL-10. These findings suggest that M1 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with dysfunction or rejection, whereas M2 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with stable function. Conclusion: Our observations implicate a major shift towards M2 macrophages in stable kidney transplants, which are markedly downregulated in patients with graft dysfunction or rejection. In contrast, an increased frequency of M1 macrophages remained dominant in the pathophysiology of kidney transplants undergoing active dysfunction or rejection.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gastroenterological complications in kidney transplant patients
    Calogero, Armando
    Gallo, Monica
    Sica, Antonello
    Peluso, Gaia
    Scotti, Alessandro
    Tammaro, Vincenzo
    Carrano, Rosa
    Federico, Stefano
    Lionetti, Ruggero
    Amato, Maurizio
    Carlomagno, Nicola
    Dodaro, Concetta Anna
    Sagnelli, Caterina
    Santangelo, Michele
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2020, 15 (01): : 623 - 634
  • [42] PSYCHOTHERAPY WITH PATIENTS RECEIVING KIDNEY TRANSPLANT
    KEMPH, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1967, 124 (05): : 623 - +
  • [43] Quality of life in kidney transplant patients
    Ichikawa, Y
    Fujisawa, M
    Hirose, E
    Kageyama, T
    Miyamoto, Y
    Sakai, Y
    Mori, F
    Isotani, S
    Yazawa, K
    Hanafusa, T
    Fujikubo, M
    Fukunishi, T
    Kamidono, S
    Nagano, S
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (07) : 1815 - 1816
  • [44] BELATACEPT IN SLE KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
    Carrion Barbera, Irene
    Fajardo, Melissa
    Tsapepas, Demetra
    Fernandez, Hilda
    Askanase, Anca
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 1694 - 1695
  • [45] AN EVALUATION OF SARCOPENIA IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
    Unagami, Kohei
    Ishihara, Hiroki
    Okumi, Masayoshi
    Ishida, Hideki
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    Nitta, Kosaku
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 : 218 - 218
  • [46] Oscillopsia and pseudonystagmus in kidney transplant patients
    Yen, MT
    Herdman, SJ
    Tusa, RJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 128 (06) : 768 - 770
  • [47] Oxidative stress in kidney transplant patients
    Moharram, Shaianmehr
    Vahid, Soltani
    Hassan, Khadem Ansari Mohammad
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 44 (13) : S174 - S174
  • [48] Bone Disease in Kidney Transplant Patients
    Huang, Minna
    Sprague, Stuart M.
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 29 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [49] Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplant Patients
    Hernandez, L.
    Casal, H.
    Benenati, V.
    Quintero, G.
    Izaguirre, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 516 - 516
  • [50] Nutritional status in kidney transplant patients
    Kiisk, L.
    Lintsi, M.
    Mesikepp, S.
    Seppet, E.
    Saluste, L.
    Pechter, U.
    Ots, M.
    NUTRITION AND METABOLISM IN RENAL DISEASE, 2006, : 63 - +