Two approaches to transient stability-constrained optimal power flow

被引:26
|
作者
Ahmadi, H. [1 ]
Ghasemi, H. [1 ]
Haddadi, A. M. [1 ]
Lesani, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran 14174, Iran
关键词
Optimal power flow; Transient stability boundary; Excitation system; Artificial neural network; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHM; PREVENTIVE CONTROL; SYSTEMS; DISPATCH; ENHANCEMENT; BOUNDARY; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.11.004
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Formulation of transient stability-constrained optimal power flow (TSC-OPF) and finding a practical solution for the problem have gained much attention recently. In this paper, two approaches to include transient stability constraints in the OFF problem considering detailed dynamic models for generators and their controls are introduced. The first method is based on the maximum relative rotor angle deviation (MRRAD) of generators which suits systems that have specific requirements on MRRAD. The second method represents the transient stability margin of the system based on generators output power (GOP) and hence does not rely on MRRADs. The transient stability boundary can be represented by a non-linear function of GOP. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) curve-fitting tool is used to derive a mathematical formulation for the transient stability boundary (TSB). The closed form representation of the TSB is then inserted in the OPF problem as a new constraint. The proposed method is examined using the WSCC 9-bus, the New England 39-bus and the IEEE 300-bus test systems. The results indicate that the proposed methods lead to lower computational time in solving TSC-OPF which has been a serious challenge for this problem. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 192
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of a stability-constrained optimal power flow to tuning of oscillation controls in competitive electricity markets
    Kodsi, Sameh K. A.
    Canizares, Claudio A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (04) : 1944 - 1954
  • [42] Small-Signal Stability-Constrained Optimal Power Flow for Inverter Dominant Autonomous Microgrids
    Pullaguram, Deepak
    Madani, Ramtin
    Altun, Tuncay
    Davoudi, Ali
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2022, 69 (07) : 7318 - 7328
  • [43] A Two-Level Parallel Decomposition Approach for Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow
    Geng, Guangchao
    Jiang, Quanyuan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (04) : 2063 - 2073
  • [44] Performance Analysis for Two-Level Parallel Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow
    Geng, Guangchao
    Jiang, Quanyuan
    Ajjarapu, Venkataramana
    2013 NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS), 2013,
  • [45] A Two-Level Parallel Decomposition Approach for Transient Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow
    Geng, Guangchao
    Jiang, Quanyuan
    2013 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PES), 2013,
  • [46] A new voltage stability-constrained optimal power flow model: Sufficient condition, SOCP representation, and relaxation
    School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
    GA
    30332, United States
    不详
    GA
    30332, United States
    arXiv,
  • [47] Transient stability-constrained maximum allowable transfer
    Bettiol, AL
    Wehenkel, L
    Pavella, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (02) : 654 - 659
  • [48] Contingency filtering technique for transient stability constrained optimal power flow
    Jiang, Quanyuan
    Huang, Zhiguang
    Xu, Kai
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2013, 7 (12) : 1536 - 1546
  • [49] Transient Stability Constrained Line-Flow-Based Optimal Power Flow Analysis
    Uzoechi, Lazarus O.
    Mahajan, Satish M.
    Radman, Ghadir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 13 (02):
  • [50] Application of differential evolution algorithm for transient stability constrained optimal power flow
    Cai, H. R.
    Chung, C. Y.
    Wong, K. P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) : 719 - 728