CHALLENGES IN USING A DELPHI METHOD TO FORMALIZE CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN FUNCTIONAL REASONING

被引:0
|
作者
Scott, Michael J. [1 ]
Allen, Margaret G. [2 ]
Gaur, Diksha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Design & Decis Lab, Mech & Ind Engn, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Design & Decis Lab, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONCEPT INVENTORY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A project to develop a concept inventory for functional reasoning in engineering design using a Delphi method encountered some unanticipated difficulties at the outset. The anonymous elicitation of a list of candidate concepts from an expert panel was expected to be a straightforward first step in a process in which the main work would be the creation and validation of multiple choice questions to probe understanding of these concepts. Low response rates and inconsistent concept descriptions led to a reconsideration of the nature of the concept inventory project. The early results from the project are discussed and compared with a similar stage of a different concept inventory project in thermodynamics. Implications of this comparison for the field of functional reasoning and the development of concept inventories for relatively immature fields are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Grand Challenges in global eye health: a global prioritisation process using Delphi method
    Ramke, Jacqueline
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Habtamu, Esmael
    Mwangi, Nyawira
    Silva, Juan Carlos
    Swenor, Bonnielin K.
    Congdon, Nathan
    Faal, Hannah B.
    Foster, Allen
    Friedman, David S.
    Gichuhi, Stephen
    Jonas, Jost B.
    Khaw, Peng
    Kyari, Fatima
    Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S.
    Wang, Ningli
    Wong, Tien Y.
    Wormald, Richard
    Yusufu, Mayinuer
    Taylor, Hugh
    Resnikoff, Serge
    West, Sheila K.
    Burton, Matthew J.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 3 (01): : E31 - E41
  • [32] Rewards and challenges of family practice - Web-based survey using the Delphi method
    Manca, Donna P.
    Varnhagen, Stanley
    Brett-MacLean, Pamela
    Allan, G. Michael
    Szafran, Olga
    Ausford, Allen
    Rowntree, Carol
    Rumzan, Ismael
    Turner, Diana
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 53 : 277 - 286
  • [33] Using 'rules of thumb' practices to enhance conceptual understanding and scientific reasoning in project-based inquiry classrooms
    Ryan, MT
    Kolodner, JL
    ICLS2004: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, PROCEEDINGS: EMBRACING DIVERSITY IN THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2004, : 449 - 456
  • [34] Interactions between reasoning about complex systems and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry
    Samon, Sigal
    Levy, Sharona T.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2020, 57 (01) : 58 - 86
  • [35] Algorithmic and conceptual understanding differences in general chemistry: A link to reasoning ability.
    Deming, JC
    Ehlert, BE
    Cracolice, MS
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 226 : U268 - U268
  • [36] The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: conceptual challenges for crime science
    Bouhana, Noemie
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [37] Reasoning with ontologies by using knowledge conjunction in Conceptual Graphs
    Corbett, D
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS 2002: COOPLS, DOA, AND ODBASE, 2002, 2519 : 1304 - 1316
  • [38] Inductive Reasoning about Ontologies Using Conceptual Spaces
    Bouraoui, Zied
    Jameel, Shoaib
    Schockaert, Steven
    THIRTY-FIRST AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 4364 - 4370
  • [39] Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning
    Nieminen, Pasi
    Savinainen, Antti
    Viiri, Jouni
    PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2012, 8 (01):
  • [40] THE USE OF THE DELPHI METHOD FOR THE VALIDATION OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
    Alves, Wellington
    Colombo, Ciliana Regina
    Portela, Claudio Ruy
    Ferreira, Paula
    Dalia, Raissa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT EVALUATION (ICOPEV), 2014, : 195 - 201