Risk-constrained stochastic optimal allocation of energy storage system in virtual power plants

被引:38
|
作者
Sadeghian, Omid [1 ]
Oshnoei, Arman [2 ]
Khezri, Rahmat [3 ]
Muyeen, Sm [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE | 2020年 / 31卷
关键词
Energy storage system; Market uncertainty; Optimal allocation; Renewable energy sources; Virtual power plant; Risk-based optimization; SPINNING RESERVE; STRATEGY; OPTIMIZATION; PLACEMENT; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2020.101732
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper aims to develop a decision-making procedure for efficient placement and sizing of energy storage system (ESS) within virtual power plants (VPPs) premises under the uncertainty of market price. The main aim is to minimize the overall cost of VPP within a fixed time horizon planning. The understudy VPP consists of wind turbine, photovoltaic system, curtailable loads, ESS, and diesel generators in which the VPP trades electricity with the upstream grid. The proposed framework investigates both optimal power and optimal energy of ESS based on the available budget for investment. To hedge against the uncertainty of investment, an efficient risk management manner based on the concept of conditional value at risk is applied. Moreover, from the reliability point of view, two reliability indices: the loss of load expectation and energy expected not served, are evaluated under different levels of investment to assess the impact of ESS on VPP reliability. The proposed model is formulated as a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem and is solved by the well-known General Algebraic Modeling System commercial software package. The effectiveness of the proposed risk-based opti-mization approach is demonstrated through vigorous case studies and comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-Constrained Stochastic Virtual Bidding in Two-Settlement Electricity Markets
    Xiao, Dongliang
    Qiao, Wei
    Qu, Liyan
    2018 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2018,
  • [22] Optimal Allocation of Energy Storage in a Future Congolese Power System
    Akele-sita, A.
    Chowdhury, S. P.
    2015 50TH INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC), 2015,
  • [23] RETRACTED: Risk-constrained stochastic power procurement of storage-based large electricity consumer (Retracted Article)
    Cao, Yan
    Wang, Qiangfeng
    Fan, Qingming
    Nojavan, Sayyad
    Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 28
  • [24] Risk-averse risk-constrained optimal control
    Sopasakis, Pantelis
    Schuurmans, Mathijs
    Patrinos, Panagiotis
    2019 18TH EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2019, : 375 - 380
  • [25] Look-ahead risk-constrained scheduling of wind power integrated system with compressed air energy storage (CAES) plant
    Aliasghari, Parinaz
    Zamani-Gargari, Milad
    Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam
    ENERGY, 2018, 160 : 668 - 677
  • [26] Optimal Sizing of Energy Storage System for Wind Power Plants
    Shu, Zhen
    Jirutitijaroen, Panida
    2012 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2012,
  • [27] Risk-Constrained Scheduling of Energy Hubs: A Stochastic-Robust Optimization Approach
    Najafi-Ghalelou, Afshin
    Khorasany, Mohsen
    Razzaghi, Reza
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04): : 5787 - 5798
  • [28] Optimal and robust contracts for a risk-constrained principal
    Rogers, L. C. G.
    MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 2 (03) : 151 - 171
  • [29] Frequency constrained energy storage system allocation in power system with high renewable penetration
    Wang, Heng
    Zhang, Xinyan
    Sun, Yiqian
    Li, Qing
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 90
  • [30] Optimal and robust contracts for a risk-constrained principal
    L. C. G. Rogers
    Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2009, 2 : 151 - 171