Fascia lliaca Block for Analgesia After Hip Arthroplasty A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

被引:85
|
作者
Shariat, Ali N. [1 ]
Hadzic, Admir [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Daquan [2 ]
Shastri, Uma [2 ]
Kwofie, Kwesi [2 ]
Gandhi, Kishor [2 ,3 ]
McCally, Colleen Mitgang [2 ]
Gratenstein, Kimberly [2 ]
Vandepitte, Catherine [2 ,4 ]
Gadsden, Jeff [2 ]
Unis, Douglas [5 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Anesthesiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp Ctr, Dept Orthoped, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
ILIACA COMPARTMENT BLOCK; FRACTURE; MORPHINE; NERVE;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0b013e31828a3c7c
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Fascia iliaca block (FIB) is often used to treat pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite a lack of randomized trials to evaluate its efficacy for this indication. The objective of this study was to assess the analgesic benefit of FIB after THA. Our primary hypothesis was administration of FIB decreases the intensity of postoperative pain (numeric rating scale [NRS-11] score) compared with sham block (SB) in patients after THA. Methods: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 32 eligible patients having THA were recruited. In the postoperative care unit, although all patients received intravenous morphine sulfate patient-controlled analgesia, patients reporting pain of 3 or greater on the NRS-11 scale were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca (30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine) or SB (30 mL 0.9% NaCl) using identical technique, below fascia iliaca. The primary outcome was pain intensity (NRS-11) after FIB. Results: Thirty-two patients (16 in each group) completed the study; all patients received an FIB. There was no difference in pain intensity (NRS-11 = 5.0 +/- 0.6 vs 4.7 +/- 0.6, respectively) after FIB versus SB or in opioid consumption (8.97 +/- 1.6 vs 5.7 +/- 1.6 mg morphine, respectively) between the groups at 1 hour. The morphine consumption after 24 hours was similar in both groups (49.0 +/- 29.9 vs 50.4 +/- 34.5 mg, P = 0.88, respectively). Conclusions: The evidence in these data suggests that the difference in average pain intensity after FIB versus SB was not significant (95% confidence interval, -2.2-1.4 NRS units). (Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38: 201-205)
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREOPERATIVE MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    KAVANAGH, B
    KATZ, J
    SANDLER, A
    NIERENBERG, H
    ROGER, S
    BOYLAN, J
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (02): : S182 - S182
  • [22] Effect of high-dose preoperative methylprednisolone on recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Lunn, T. H.
    Andersen, L. O.
    Kristensen, B. B.
    Husted, H.
    Gaarn-Larsen, L.
    Bandholm, T.
    Ladelund, S.
    Kehlet, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [23] Single-Dose Adductor Canal Block With Local Infiltrative Analgesia Compared With Local Infiltrate Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Nader, Antoun
    Kendall, Mark C.
    Manning, David W.
    Beal, Matthew
    Rahangdale, Rohit
    Dekker, Robert
    De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr.
    Kamenetsky, Eric
    McCarthy, Robert J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (06) : 678 - 684
  • [24] Pain Management Using Perioperative Administration of Parecoxib for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Xiao, Ke
    Yu, Lingjia
    Xiao, Weiyuan
    Peng, Huiming
    Bian, Yanyan
    Wu, Zhihong
    Weng, Xisheng
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2019, 22 (06) : 575 - 582
  • [25] Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia or Multimodal Pain Regimen with Periarticular Injection After Total Hip Arthroplasty A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Jules-Elysee, Kethy M.
    Goon, Amanda K.
    Westrich, Geoffrey H.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    Mayman, David J.
    Ranawat, Amar S.
    Ranawat, Chitranjan S.
    Lin, Yi
    Kahn, Richard L.
    Bhagat, Devan D.
    Goytizolo, Enrique A.
    Ma, Yan
    Reid, Shane C.
    Curren, Jodie
    YaDeau, Jacques T.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (10): : 789 - 798
  • [26] Multimodal analgesia for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial
    Jo C.H.
    Shin J.S.
    Huh J.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (3) : 315 - 322
  • [27] Preemptive Analgesia with Bupivacaine in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Valente, Denis S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (04) : 581 - 586
  • [28] Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Milleron, Olivier
    Arnoult, Florence
    Ropers, Jacques
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Detaint, Delphine
    Delorme, Gabriel
    Attias, David
    Tubach, Florence
    Dupuis-Girod, Sophie
    Plauchu, Henry
    Barthelet, Martine
    Sassolas, Francois
    Pangaud, Nicolas
    Naudion, Sophie
    Thomas-Chabaneix, Julie
    Dulac, Yves
    Edouard, Thomas
    Wolf, Jean-Eric
    Faivre, Laurence
    Odent, Sylvie
    Basquin, Adeline
    Habib, Gilbert
    Collignon, Patrick
    Boileau, Catherine
    Jondeau, Guillaume
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (32) : 2160 - U37
  • [29] A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled laser trial methodology
    Oussedik, E.
    Saleem, M. D.
    Patel, N. U.
    Feldman, S. R.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : B11 - B11
  • [30] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pseudoephedrine in coryza
    Latte, J
    Taverner, D
    Slobodian, P
    Shakib, S
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 31 (07): : 429 - 432