Platelets reflect the fate of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

被引:10
|
作者
Inoue, Kentaro [1 ,2 ]
Furuyama, Tadashi [1 ]
Kurose, Shun [1 ]
Yoshino, Shinichiro [1 ]
Nakayama, Ken [1 ]
Yamashita, Sho [1 ]
Morisaki, Koichi [1 ]
Kume, Masazumi [2 ]
Matsumoto, Takuya [3 ]
Mori, Masaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Sci, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Beppu Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Beppu, Oita, Japan
[3] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Vasc Surg, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Endoleak; Platelet; Aneurysm sac enlargement; RISK-FACTORS; COAGULATION; FIBRINOLYSIS; ULTRASOUND; RUPTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.062
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The management of type II endoleak (T2E) remains controversial because of the heterogeneous outcome. For blood-based screening to detect malignant T2E, we focused on platelets after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and compared them with the prognosis of T2Es. Methods: From 2007 to 2015, there were 249 patients treated with EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm who were evaluated retrospectively. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 +/- 0.2 years. T2Es that had aneurysm sac enlargement or converted to type I or type III endoleak were defined as malignant; the other T2Es were considered benign. Cases without any complications, including T2E, were defined as completed. We compared the platelet count on postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 7 with preoperative baseline values among the three groups. Sequentially, we calculated the cutoff of the platelet ratio on POD 7 to the baseline value in relation to malignant T2E using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the cutoff ratio was 113% (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 58%). We then reclassified T2E patients into T2E-high platelet (T2E-HP; >= 113%) or T2E-low platelet (T2E-LP; <113%) groups. The influence of platelets on T2E was evaluated with reintervention rate and cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rate using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: T2Es were found in 70 patients (28%), and 179 patients were assigned to the completed group. Malignant and benign T2Es were found in 33 and 37 patients, respectively. No difference was found in the preoperative baseline values. On POD 7, the platelet count in the malignant T2E group was significantly lower than that in the completed and benign T2E groups (168 x 10(3)/mL vs 20(7) x 10(3)/mL and 201 x 10(3)/mL; P = .0124). Then, 27 and 43 patients were assigned to the T2E-HP and T2E-LP groups, respectively. The reintervention-free survival rate in the T2E-LP group was lower than that in the completed group (at 3 years, 66.4% +/- 8.0% vs 71.9% +/- 4.0%; P = .0031). Among T2E patients, the cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rates in the T2E-LP group were significantly higher than those in the T2E-HP group (at 3 years, 34.6% +/- 8.2% vs 20.6% 6 8.2%; P = .0105). Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for the cumulative aneurysm sac enlargement rates among T2E patients showed that sex, dual antiplatelet therapy, and lower platelet ratio (<113%) were significant predictors; multivariate analysis showed that T2E-LP was the only significant predictor (hazard ratio, 2.60; P = .0355). Conclusions: The platelet count of patients with malignant T2Es on POD 7 was definitively lower than that of patients with completed EVAR or with benign T2Es. The lower platelet count on POD 7 could be a risk factor for aneurysm sac enlargement among patients with T2Es.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: current concepts
    Choke, E
    Thompson, M
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 45 (04): : 349 - 366
  • [42] Evaluation of Type II Endoleak Repair Outcomes in Patients with Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Cawley, Mary
    Finley, Jacqueline
    Huntress, Lauren A.
    Rahimi, Saum
    Beckerman, William E.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E318 - E318
  • [43] Combined transcatheter aortic valve implantation and type II endoleak repair after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Horiuchi Y.
    Izumo M.
    Kusuhara T.
    Yokozuka M.
    Taketani T.
    Tanabe K.
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2017, 32 (3) : 304 - 307
  • [44] Impact of the Lumbar Arteries on Aneurysm Diameter and Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Ueda, Ryoma
    Esaki, Jiro
    Tsubota, Hideki
    Honda, Masanori
    Kudo, Masafumi
    Nakatsuma, Kenji
    Kato, Masashi
    Okabayashi, Hitoshi
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 100 : 138 - 147
  • [45] Repair of type I endoleak by chimney technique after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Kim, Na Hee
    Kim, Woo Chul
    Jeon, Yong Sun
    Cho, Soon Gu
    Hong, Kee Chun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 86 (05) : 274 - 277
  • [46] Role of an Endoleak Team Creation in the Management of Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Chisci, Emiliano
    Raspanti, Claudio
    Michelagnoli, Stefano
    Giuntoli, Federico
    Panci, Simone
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (04) : 2S - 3S
  • [47] Endovascular management of the patent inferior mesenteric artery in two cases of uncontrolled type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Kim, Hans
    Sullivan, Theodore R.
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 3 (08) : 387 - 390
  • [48] Prophylactic treatment of type II endoleak at the time of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Zanchetta, M.
    Ronsisvalle, S.
    Zennaro, M.
    Faresin, F.
    Riggi, M.
    Pedon, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 : 289 - 289
  • [49] Transcaval approach for embolization of type II Endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Eddie Hyatt
    Joseph N. McLaughlin
    Hriday Shah
    Sanjeeva P. Kalva
    CVIR Endovascular, 2
  • [50] Transcaval approach for embolization of type II Endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Hyatt, Eddie
    McLaughlin, Joseph N.
    Shah, Hriday
    Kalva, Sanjeeva P.
    CVIR ENDOVASCULAR, 2019, 2 (01)