Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

被引:208
|
作者
Shekelle, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Woolf, Steven [3 ,4 ]
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. [5 ,6 ]
Schuenemann, Holger J. [7 ,8 ]
Eccles, Martin P. [9 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Family Med, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Ctr Human Needs, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2012年 / 7卷
关键词
FRAMEWORK; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-7-62
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical practice guidelines are one of the foundations of efforts to improve health care. In 1999, we authored a paper about methods to develop guidelines. Since it was published, the methods of guideline development have progressed both in terms of methods and necessary procedures and the context for guideline development has changed with the emergence of guideline clearing houses and large scale guideline production organisations (such as the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence). It therefore seems timely to, in a series of three articles, update and extend our earlier paper. In this third paper we discuss the issues of: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the two emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and how guideline developers should approach dealing with the issue of patients who will be the subject of guidelines having co-morbid conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE AND NATIONAL GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT. DO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CARE AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) GUIDELINES PROVIDE THERAPISTS WITH MEANINGFUL EVIDENCE FOR PRACTICE?
    Christie, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2018, 81 : 21 - 22
  • [32] Online consensus conferences for the development and update of clinical practice guidelines: A survey among participants of the German S3 guideline on actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
    Steeb, Theresa
    Follmann, Markus
    Langer, Thomas
    Nothacker, Monika
    Wessely, Anja
    Garbe, Claus
    Leiter, Ulrike
    Berking, Carola
    Heppt, Markus V.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2021, 19 (04): : 608 - 610
  • [33] Quality appraisal of clinical nutrition practice guidelines for critically ill adult patients: a systematic review using the Advancing Guideline Development, Reporting and Evaluation in Health Care instrument II (AGREE-II) and AGREE-Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX)
    Cattani, Aline
    Teixeira, Paula Portal
    Eckert, Igor da Conceicao
    Busnello, Fernanda
    Gabriel, Franciele
    Stein, Airton
    Silva, Flavia Moraes
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 129 (01) : 66 - 76
  • [34] Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, CARE Group: The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:223.
    Walach, Harald
    FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN, 2013, 20 (05): : 385 - 386