Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes

被引:3664
|
作者
Hayes, SC [1 ]
Luoma, JB
Bond, FW
Masuda, A
Lillis, J
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Univ London Goldsmiths Coll, London SE14 6NW, England
关键词
acceptance and commitment therapy; relational frame theory; mindfulness; acceptance; mediational analysis; third generation CBT; clinical behavior analysis; contextualism;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present article presents and reviews the model of psychopathology and treatment underlying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). ACT is unusual in that it is linked to a comprehensive active basic research program on the nature of human language and cognition (Relational Frame Theory), echoing back to an earlier era of behavior therapy in which clinical treatments were consciously based on basic behavioral principles. The evidence from correlational, component, process of change, and outcome comparisons relevant to the model are broadly supportive, but the literature is not mature and many questions have not yet been examined. What evidence is available suggests that ACT works through different processes than active treatment comparisons, including traditional Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT). There are not enough well-controlled studies to conclude that ACT is generally more effective than other active treatments across the range of problems examined, but so far the data are promising. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
    Jacqueline G. L. A-Tjak
    Nexhmedin Morina
    Wouter J. Boendermaker
    Maurice Topper
    Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
    BMC Psychiatry, 20
  • [32] Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
    A-Tjak, Jacqueline G. L.
    Morina, Nexhmedin
    Boendermaker, Wouter J.
    Topper, Maurice
    Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Network intervention analysis of anxiety-related outcomes and processes of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for anxious cancer survivors
    Fishbein, Joel N.
    Haslbeck, Jonas
    Arch, Joanna J.
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2023, 162
  • [34] Preliminary validation of a Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes
    Chen, Yue
    Luo, Houyuan
    Wang, Shujuan
    Bai, Xiaoyu
    Zhu, Zhuohong
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (18) : 15528 - 15538
  • [35] Preliminary validation of a Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes
    Yue Chen
    Houyuan Luo
    Shujuan Wang
    Xiaoyu Bai
    Zhuohong Zhu
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 15528 - 15538
  • [36] Processes of Change in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A Mediation Reanalysis of Zettle and Rains
    Zettle, Robert D.
    Rains, Jeanetta C.
    Hayes, Steven C.
    BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2011, 35 (03) : 265 - 283
  • [37] Effect of acceptance for values -In context of Acceptance & Commitment Therapy
    Kamiya, Shinki
    Kikai, Tomoki
    Ito, Yoshinori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 133 - 133
  • [38] FEASIBILITY AND OUTCOMES OF ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY FOR BINGE EATING SYMPTOMS IN OBESE VETERANS
    Cuneo, Jessica M. Gundy
    Wright, Lisa Johnson
    Backhaus, Autumn
    Godfrey, Katherine
    Afari, Niloofar
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 47 : S145 - S145
  • [39] Mapping acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) outcomes in the context of infertility: A systematic review
    Barbosa, C.
    Santos, S.
    Pedro, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I427 - I427
  • [40] Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness for Chronic Pain Model, Process, and Progress
    McCracken, Lance M.
    Vowles, Kevin E.
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 69 (02) : 178 - 187