Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making

被引:17
|
作者
Falben, Johanna K. [1 ]
Golubickis, Marius [2 ]
Tamulaitis, Skomantas [1 ]
Caughey, Siobhan [1 ]
Tsamadi, Dimitra [1 ]
Persson, Linn M. [1 ]
Svensson, Saga L. [1 ]
Sahraie, Arash [1 ]
Macrae, C. Neil [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Psychol, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland
[2] Univ Plymouth, Sch Psychol, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
Self-prioritization; Ownership; Self-relevance; Evidence accumulation; Drift diffusion model; DIFFUSION-MODEL; PRIOR PROBABILITY; SOCIAL SALIENCE; TELL US; PRIORITIZATION; OWNERSHIP; MINE; BIAS; ME; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Despite repeated demonstrations that self-relevant material is prioritized during stimulus appraisal, a number of unresolved issues remain. In particular, it is unclear if self-relevance facilitates task performance when stimuli are encountered under challenging processing conditions. To explore this issue, using a backward masking procedure, here participants were required to report if briefly presented objects (pencils and pens) had previously been assigned to the self or a best friend (i.e., object-ownership task). The results yielded a standard self-ownership effect, such that responses were faster and more accurate to self-owned (vs. friend-owned) objects. In addition, a drift diffusion model analysis indicated that this effect was underpinned by a stimulus bias. Specifically, evidence was accumulated more rapidly from self-owned compared to friend-owned stimuli. These findings further elucidate the extent and origin of self-prioritization during decisional processing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statistical evidence and algorithmic decision-making
    Holm, Sune
    SYNTHESE, 2023, 202 (01)
  • [32] Decision-Making and Evidence in Direct Practice
    Anne Marie McLaughlin
    Michael Rothery
    Rochelle (Robbie) Babins-Wagner
    Barbara Schleifer
    Clinical Social Work Journal, 2010, 38 : 155 - 163
  • [33] Decision-Making and Evidence in Direct Practice
    McLaughlin, Anne Marie
    Rothery, Michael
    Babins-Wagner, Rochelle
    Schleifer, Barbara
    CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [34] Evidence-Based Decision-Making
    Kurien, Vino Tito V.
    Shamsuddeen, Suhana
    Mahitha, M. C.
    Rasheed, Diya S.
    JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2022, 10 (01): : 48 - 52
  • [35] EVIDENCE EVALUATION IN COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING
    PENNINGTON, N
    HASTIE, R
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (02) : 242 - 258
  • [36] THE PRACTICE OF DECISION-MAKING - SOME EVIDENCE
    HILL, S
    BLYTON, P
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 1986, 7 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [37] DECISION-MAKING - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE
    GREEN, DE
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1977, 2 (03) : N59 - N60
  • [38] JUROR DECISION-MAKING - THE IMPORTANCE OF EVIDENCE
    VISHER, CA
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1987, 11 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [39] Quality of Evidence and Legal Decision-Making
    Jose Ganuza, Juan
    Gomez, Fernando
    Penalva, Jose
    AMERICAN LAW AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 24 (01) : 327 - 368
  • [40] Evidence-based decision-making
    Smith, ER
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 19 (06) : 729 - 730