Transactive memory systems scale for couples: development and validation

被引:7
|
作者
Hewitt, Lauren Y. [1 ]
Roberts, Lynne D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Psychol & Speech Pathol, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
transactive memory; romantic couples; memory research; PERCEIVED COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; APPREHENSION; RETRIEVAL; VALIDITY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00516
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People in romantic relationships can develop shared memory systems by pooling their cognitive resources, allowing each person access to more information but with less cognitive effort. Research examining such memory systems in romantic couples largely focuses on remembering word lists or performing lab-based tasks, but these types of activities do not capture the processes underlying couples' transactive memory systems, and may not be representative of the ways in which romantic couples use their shared memory systems in everyday life. We adapted an existing measure of transactive memory systems for use with romantic couples (TMSS-C), and conducted an initial validation study. In total, 397 participants who each identified as being a member of a romantic relationship of at least 3 months duration completed the study. The data provided a good fit to the anticipated three-factor structure of the components of couples' transactive memory systems (specialization, credibility and coordination), and there was reasonable evidence of both convergent and divergent validity, as well as strong evidence of test retest reliability across a 2-week period. The TMSS-C provides a valuable tool that can quickly and easily capture the underlying components of romantic couples' transactive memory systems. It has potential to help us better understand this intriguing feature of romantic relationships, and how shared memory systems might be associated with other important features of romantic relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Development and Validation of the Memory Support Rating Scale
    Lee, Jason Y.
    Worrell, Frank C.
    Harvey, Allison G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 28 (06) : 715 - 725
  • [22] TQM in systems development: Scale development and validation
    Ravichandran, T
    DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1997, : 837 - 839
  • [23] Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems
    Hollingshead, AB
    Brandon, DP
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (04) : 607 - 615
  • [24] Transactive Memory Systems: A Microfoundation of Dynamic Capabilities
    Argote, Linda
    Ren, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2012, 49 (08) : 1375 - 1382
  • [25] Alignment, Transactive Memory, and Collective Cognitive Systems
    Tollefsen D.P.
    Dale R.
    Paxton A.
    Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013, 4 (1) : 49 - 64
  • [26] Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems
    Hollingshead, AB
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 34 (05) : 423 - 442
  • [27] The impact of transactive memory systems on team performance
    Huang, Qian
    Liu, Hefu
    Zhong, Xuepan
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2013, 26 (02) : 191 - 212
  • [28] Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer
    Lewis, K
    Lange, D
    Gillis, L
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (06) : 581 - 598
  • [29] Organizational Transactive Memory Systems Review and Extension
    Peltokorpi, Vesa
    EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [30] Development and Validation of the Systems Thinking Scale
    Dolansky, Mary A.
    Moore, Shirley M.
    Palmieri, Patrick A.
    Singh, Mamta K.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (08) : 2314 - 2320