Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
You, John J. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yudong [3 ]
Kirby, John [4 ]
Vora, Parag [5 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Connolly Hosp Blanchardstown, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
来源
TRIALS | 2015年 / 16卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Computed tomography colonography; Fecal occult blood testing; pilot study; Prevention; Randomized controlled trial; Screening; Virtual colonoscopy; CT COLONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-015-0826-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: No head-to-head randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of one colorectal screening modality over another in reducing colorectal cancer mortality. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), optical colonoscopy (OC), and virtual colonoscopy (VC), to inform the planning of a larger evaluative trial. Methods: Eligible patients (aged 50 to 70) were recruited from five primary care practices in Hamilton, ON, Canada, between March 23, 2010 and August 11, 2010, and randomized 1:1:1 in a parallel design using an automated, centralized telephone service to either FOBT, OC, or VC. To reflect conventional practice, patients received no additional reminders to complete their allocated screening test beyond those received in usual practice. The primary outcome was completion of the assigned screening procedure. Results of the index test and any follow-up investigations were ascertained at 6 months. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were not blinded to group assignment. The trial was stopped early due to lack of ongoing funding. Results: A total of 198 participants were enrolled, of whom 67 were allocated to FOBT, 66 to OC, and 65 to VC. The allocated screening procedure was completed by 43 (64 %) subjects allocated to FOBT (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52-75 %), 53 (80 %) subjects allocated to OC (95 % CI, 69-88 %), and 50 (77 %) subjects allocated to VC (95 % CI, 65-85 %); because the trial stopped early, we had insufficient statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences in completion rates. During 6 months follow-up, colorectal adenomas were detected in 0 (0 %) subjects allocated to FOBT, 12 (18 %) subjects allocated to OC, and 2 (3 %) subjects allocated to VC. One subject in the OC arm had histological evidence of high-grade dysplasia. No subjects were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: In this pilot randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening in a primary care setting, 64-80 % of subjects completed their allocated screening test. These findings may be of value to investigators planning clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Colorectal cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy
    Ge, Y
    Vining, DJ
    Ahn, DK
    Stelts, DR
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTION FROM MULTIDIMENSIONAL IMAGES, 1999, 3660 : 94 - 105
  • [22] Virtual colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening
    A. S. Chaoui
    M. A. Blake
    M. A. Barish
    H. M. Fenlon
    Abdominal Imaging, 2000, 25 : 361 - 367
  • [23] Virtual colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening
    Chaoui, AS
    Blake, MA
    Barish, MA
    Fenlon, HM
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2000, 25 (04): : 361 - 367
  • [24] Virtual colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening
    Torres, Carlos
    Szomstein, Samuel
    Wexner, Steven D.
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2007, 14 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [25] Colorectal cancer: Fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and potential role of genetic markers
    Markowitz, AJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 45 (06) : S24 - S24
  • [26] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TESTING IN THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    FARRANDS, PA
    BALFOUR, TW
    CHAMBERLAIN, J
    AMAR, SS
    SHELDON, MG
    LANCET, 1983, 2 (8340): : 1 - 4
  • [27] Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening
    Quintero, Enrique
    Castells, Antoni
    Bujanda, Luis
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Salas, Dolores
    Lanas, Angel
    Andreu, Montserrat
    Carballo, Fernando
    Diego Morillas, Juan
    Hernandez, Cristina
    Jover, Rodrigo
    Montalvo, Isabel
    Arenas, Juan
    Laredo, Eva
    Hernandez, Vicent
    Iglesias, Felipe
    Cid, Estela
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Sala, Teresa
    Ponce, Marta
    Andres, Mercedes
    Teruel, Gloria
    Peris, Antonio
    Roncales, Maria-Pilar
    Polo-Tomas, Monica
    Bessa, Xavier
    Ferrer-Armengou, Olga
    Grau, Jaume
    Serradesanferm, Anna
    Ono, Akiko
    Cruzado, Jose
    Perez-Riquelme, Francisco
    Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada
    de la Vega-Prieto, Mariola
    Maria Reyes-Melian, Juana
    Cacho, Guillermo
    Diaz-Tasende, Jose
    Herreros-de-Tejada, Alberto
    Poves, Carmen
    Santander, Cecilio
    Gonzalez-Navarro, Andres
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (08): : 697 - 706
  • [28] FECAL OCCULT BLOOD SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION - RESULTS OF A CONTROLLED TRIAL
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    ARMITAGE, NC
    CHAMBERLAIN, J
    AMAR, SS
    JAMES, PD
    BALFOUR, TW
    CANCER, 1986, 58 (02) : 397 - 403
  • [29] Prevalence and predictors of fecal occult blood testing after colonoscopy
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    Grubber, Janet
    Coffman, Cynthia J.
    Voils, Corrine I.
    Vernon, Sally W.
    Provenzale, Dawn
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A160 - A160
  • [30] Preference for Colonoscopy in a Program of Annual Fecal Occult Blood Testing
    Zauber, Ann
    Winawer, Sidney
    Church, Timothy
    Allen, John
    Mandelson, Margaret
    Feld, Andrew
    Mills, Glenn
    Jordan, Paul
    Ruckel, Julie
    O'Brien, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S566 - S567