Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
You, John J. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yudong [3 ]
Kirby, John [4 ]
Vora, Parag [5 ]
Moayyedi, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Connolly Hosp Blanchardstown, Dept Radiol, Dublin, Ireland
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
来源
TRIALS | 2015年 / 16卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Computed tomography colonography; Fecal occult blood testing; pilot study; Prevention; Randomized controlled trial; Screening; Virtual colonoscopy; CT COLONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-015-0826-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: No head-to-head randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of one colorectal screening modality over another in reducing colorectal cancer mortality. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), optical colonoscopy (OC), and virtual colonoscopy (VC), to inform the planning of a larger evaluative trial. Methods: Eligible patients (aged 50 to 70) were recruited from five primary care practices in Hamilton, ON, Canada, between March 23, 2010 and August 11, 2010, and randomized 1:1:1 in a parallel design using an automated, centralized telephone service to either FOBT, OC, or VC. To reflect conventional practice, patients received no additional reminders to complete their allocated screening test beyond those received in usual practice. The primary outcome was completion of the assigned screening procedure. Results of the index test and any follow-up investigations were ascertained at 6 months. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were not blinded to group assignment. The trial was stopped early due to lack of ongoing funding. Results: A total of 198 participants were enrolled, of whom 67 were allocated to FOBT, 66 to OC, and 65 to VC. The allocated screening procedure was completed by 43 (64 %) subjects allocated to FOBT (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52-75 %), 53 (80 %) subjects allocated to OC (95 % CI, 69-88 %), and 50 (77 %) subjects allocated to VC (95 % CI, 65-85 %); because the trial stopped early, we had insufficient statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences in completion rates. During 6 months follow-up, colorectal adenomas were detected in 0 (0 %) subjects allocated to FOBT, 12 (18 %) subjects allocated to OC, and 2 (3 %) subjects allocated to VC. One subject in the OC arm had histological evidence of high-grade dysplasia. No subjects were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: In this pilot randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening in a primary care setting, 64-80 % of subjects completed their allocated screening test. These findings may be of value to investigators planning clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial
    John J. You
    Yudong Liu
    John Kirby
    Parag Vora
    Paul Moayyedi
    Trials, 16
  • [2] Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy and biopsy results in people undergoing colonoscopy due to positive fecal occult blood test
    Yucel, Metin
    Demirpolat, Muhammed Taha
    Yildirak, Muhammed Kadir
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 40 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [3] Nonmedical costs of colorectal cancer screening with the fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Au, Flora
    Manns, Braden J.
    Mcgregor, S. Elizabeth
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (08) : 912 - 917
  • [4] Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study)
    Lapo Sali
    Grazia Grazzini
    Francesca Carozzi
    Guido Castiglione
    Massimo Falchini
    Beatrice Mallardi
    Paola Mantellini
    Leonardo Ventura
    Daniele Regge
    Marco Zappa
    Mario Mascalchi
    Stefano Milani
    Trials, 14
  • [5] Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study)
    Sali, Lapo
    Grazzini, Grazia
    Carozzi, Francesca
    Castiglione, Guido
    Falchini, Massimo
    Mallardi, Beatrice
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ventura, Leonardo
    Regge, Daniele
    Zappa, Marco
    Mascalchi, Mario
    Milani, Stefano
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [6] Panoramic Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gach, Tomasz
    Krzak, Jan Maciej
    Bogacki, Pawel
    Szura, Miroslaw
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : S62 - S62
  • [7] Panoramic colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening - a randomized controlled trial
    Bogacki, Pawel
    Gach, Tomasz
    Krzak, Jan
    Szura, Miroslaw
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2021, 16 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [8] Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening
    Xu, Ming
    Yang, Jing-Yi
    Meng, Tao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (07):
  • [9] The public prefers fecal occult blood test over colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
    Almog, Ronit
    Ezra, Gili
    Lavi, Idit
    Rennert, Gad
    Hagoel, Lea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (05) : 430 - 437
  • [10] BLOOD TEST INCREASES COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING UPTAKE IN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE DECLINED COLONOSCOPY AND FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTING: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Liang, Peter S.
    Zaman, Anika
    Kaminsky, Anne M.
    Cui, Yongyan
    Castillo, Gabriel
    Tenner, Craig T.
    Sherman, Scott E.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB100 - AB101