How SMEs Mitigate Risks When Embarking in Open Innovation Projects

被引:0
|
作者
Tantau, Adrian Dumitru [1 ]
Paicu , Eliza Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, VOL 2 | 2013年
关键词
open innovation; SME; risks; innovation performance; collaboration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; FIRMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
SMEs are the engine of economies but slightly overlooked in the open innovation literature, which provides a scarcity of studies on the risks residing in open innovation projects involving SMEs and even fewer attempts to assess the mitigation potential of these dangers Moreover, there is a limited amount of research on the innovation practices of SMEs located in Eastern European countries. In Romania, we were not able to identify one single study reflecting the extent of open innovation projects in SMEs and the risks they face, which led us to attempt to cover this gap. What allures SMEs to embrace open innovation is their resource deficiency, insufficient abilities to explore and exploit technology, major knowledge gaps and the objective of minimizing the risks of innovation. The limited literature written on SMEs and open innovation highlights the motives, the benefits and the barriers these engines of economy confront when embarking in open innovation projects. However, no particular attempt to further the research into managing and mitigating the effective risks triggered by open innovation in SMEs was found. Based on a survey conducted on 211 Romanian SMEs in the Romanian financial services and consultancy sector, this paper both explores the risks affecting the innovation performance of SMEs in collaborative relationships, and seeks to provide a conceptual model for overcoming these threats. Within the survey, our work highlights that open innovation in Romanian SMEs is impeded by risks related to insufficient financial resources, inexperienced, unmotivated and unwilling to cooperate people, poor adaptation to technological advances in the industry, knowledge sharing risks, weak social capital and noteworthy regulation risks. All the risks identified through our research were mapped down in seven categories of risk drivers, with internal and external origin: workforce, collaboration itself, organizational culture / social capital, regulations and market barriers, clients, access to finance, technology advances. The risk mitigation model is centred on the SMEs key strategic advantages: high flexibility, ability for adaptation, people empowerment. The research results support the potential of mitigating risks SMEs face in open innovation projects, and indicate six factors as main risk mitigators: transparent communication among innovators, trust building, people empowerment, organizational learning and investment in knowledge, leadership, vision and convictions, proactiveness towards unethical behaviour. The results of our study can guide an SME to competitive advantage, parting both from the essence of collaboration in the scope of innovation, as well as from the challenge of efficiently managing the risks the process involves. Our model is appropriate to benchmark a financial sector SME. By undertaking this study we aim to contribute to the scarce literature on open innovation practices in Romanian SMEs and to shed light on the factors that a firm needs to approach in order to foster a culture for innovation and, in the same time, reduce the open innovation risks.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 596
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SMEs and Open Innovation: Global Cases and Initiatives
    Tsai, Chia-Wen
    Shen, Pei-Di
    Chiang, Yi-Chun
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN ORGANIZATIONS, 2014, 12 (01) : 76 - 78
  • [42] The role of adhocracy culture in open innovation in SMEs
    Shahin, Mohammad Muein Rasheed
    Chong, Chin Wei
    Ojo, Adedapo O.
    GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION, 2025,
  • [43] CONNECTING STRATEGY, OPEN INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE IN SMEs
    Verbano, Chiara
    Crema, Maria
    Venturini, Karen
    EDULEARN13: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, : 232 - 241
  • [44] Tin whiskers: How to mitigate and manage the risks
    Mathew, Sony
    Osterman, Michael
    Shibutani, Tadahiro
    Yu, Qiang
    Pecht, Michael
    HDP'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH DENSITY PACKAGING AND MICROSYSTEM INTEGRATION, 2007, : 22 - +
  • [45] Open data for open innovation: managing absorptive capacity in SMEs
    Huber, Franz
    Wainwright, Thomas
    Rentocchini, Francesco
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2020, 50 (01) : 31 - 46
  • [46] Geographical proximity and open innovation of SMEs in Cyprus
    Kapetaniou, Chrystalla
    Lee, Soo Hee
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2019, 52 (01) : 261 - 276
  • [47] OPEN INNOVATION IN SMES: A SURVEY IN THE PIEDMONT AREA
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Ferraris, Alberto
    INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABLE VALUE CHAIN IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, : 1960 - 1972
  • [48] Open innovation for long term projects
    Guan, Hanping
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [49] How open is innovation?
    Dahlander, Linus
    Gann, David M.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) : 699 - 709
  • [50] European SMEs' engagement in open innovation When the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do?
    De Marco, Chiara Eleonora
    Martelli, Irene
    Di Minin, Alberto
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 152