Remediation of soils contaminated with toxic organic compounds.

被引:0
|
作者
Cole, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Decontamination or removal of soil that is contaminated with toxic organic compounds can be very costly, as illustrated by the values in Figure 1. In numerous situations, cleanup activities do not take place because the cost of clean-up may exceed the value of the property or dramatically decrease the willingness of the property owner to initiate remediation. Therefore, inexpensive, but effective, remedial methods are needed because the number of U.S. sites that are contaminated by toxic organic chemicals, toxic inorganic chemicals, or a mixture of the two is quite large. In addition to the nearly 1300 locations on the National Priorities List ("Superfund") and subject to RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) there are a much larger number of sites of smaller size that may pose a threat to adjacent populations. For example, Brown, et al. estimated that 75,000 to 100,000 or more of below-ground petroleum storage tanks were leaking. Glass, et al. (1995) estimated that, in the US alone, about 37,000 candidate sites for Superfund, 80,000 sites for RCRA, 1.5 million leaking underground storage tanks, and about 25,000 Department of Defense sites in need of remediation exist. Similar situations exist in developed countries of Europe and in less developed nations. In the U.S., sale of contaminated property is difficult or impossible, a situation which may lead to abandonment by the owner and lost opportunities to redevelop contaminated, but potentially very valuable, urban sites into productive uses. Long-term use of property for military operations has also resulted in contamination with organic solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, and explosives. Wilson and Clarke (1994) estimated that remediation costs for NPL and RCRA sites alone could be as much as $750 billion, or an amount equal to the U.S. military budget for about 15 years. The cost estimate for European sites (including the European Union) is between $300 and $400 billion. At these costs, it is unlikely that more than a small fraction of the most critical sites will ever be remediated. One solution to the high cost of clean-up it to switch from expensive remedial methods to alternative methods that are significantly less expensive. On average, bioremediation is among the lowest cost methods for detoxification of soils contaminated with organic compounds (Figure 1) and composting is intermediate in cost among bioremediation technologies (Figure 2). When comparing the total budget for cleanup of a large site, the savings associated with use of bioremediation instead of chemical or physical based technologies give bioremediation an overwhelming monetary advantage (Table 1).
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advantages and challenges of Tween 80 surfactant-enhanced technologies for the remediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic compounds
    Cheng, Min
    Zeng, Guangming
    Huang, Danlian
    Yang, Chunping
    Lai, Cui
    Zhang, Chen
    Liu, Yang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 314 : 98 - 113
  • [23] Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants
    Zhang, Xiaokai
    Wang, Hailong
    He, Lizhi
    Lu, Kouping
    Sarmah, Ajit
    Li, Jianwu
    Bolan, Nanthi S.
    Pei, Jianchuan
    Huang, Huagang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (12) : 8472 - 8483
  • [24] Feasibility study of surfactant use for remediation of organic and metal contaminated soils
    Huang, Chih
    Van Benschoten, John E.
    Healy, Tara C.
    Ryan, Michael E.
    1997, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, United States (06):
  • [25] Role of biochar on composting of organic wastes and remediation of contaminated soils—a review
    Shaohua Wu
    Huijun He
    Xayanto Inthapanya
    Chunping Yang
    Li Lu
    Guangming Zeng
    Zhenfeng Han
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 16560 - 16577
  • [26] Feasibility study of surfactant use for remediation of organic and metal contaminated soils
    Huang, C
    VanBenschoten, JE
    Healy, TC
    Ryan, ME
    JOURNAL OF SOIL CONTAMINATION, 1997, 6 (05): : 537 - 556
  • [27] Remediation of organic halogen- contaminated wetland soils using biochar
    Cui, Liqiang
    Yin, Chuntao
    Chen, Tianming
    Quan, Guixiang
    Ippolito, James A.
    Liu, Benzhi
    Yan, Jinlong
    Ding, Cheng
    Hussain, Qaiser
    Umer, Muhammad
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 696
  • [28] Combined technologies for the remediation of soils contaminated by organic pollutants. A review
    Zheng, Wukui
    Cui, Tian
    Li, Hui
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2022, 20 (03) : 2043 - 2062
  • [29] Kinetic Constraints on the In-Situ Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Organic Chemicals
    Beck, Angus J.
    Jones, Kevin C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 1995, 2 (04) : 244 - 252
  • [30] Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants
    Xiaokai Zhang
    Hailong Wang
    Lizhi He
    Kouping Lu
    Ajit Sarmah
    Jianwu Li
    Nanthi S. Bolan
    Jianchuan Pei
    Huagang Huang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 8472 - 8483