Tretinoin Microsphere Gel 0.04% Pump for Treating Acne Vulgaris in Preadolescents: A Randomized, Controlled Study

被引:13
|
作者
Eichenfield, Lawrence F. [1 ,2 ]
Hebert, Adelaide A. [3 ]
Schachner, Lawrence [4 ]
Paller, Amy S. [5 ]
Rossi, Ana Beatris [6 ]
Lucky, Anne W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Rady Childrens Hosp, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Miami, Dept Dermatol, Miami, FL USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Johnson & Johnson Grp Consumer Co, Paris, France
[7] Dermatol Res Associates, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
SCHOOL-STUDENTS; CHILDHOOD ACNE; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01811.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Although acne vulgaris is common in preadolescents (<13 yrs), few acne treatments are currently approved for children. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of tretinoin microsphere gel (TMG) 0.04% pump in children aged 911 with acne vulgaris. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pilot study, patients applied TMG 0.04% pump or vehicle once daily to the face for 12 weeks. Efficacy measures were changes in facial lesion counts, Investigator Global Evaluation of acne severity using two scales, and Investigator Global Assessment of Improvement from baseline to week 12. Of the 110 patients enrolled, 55 received TMG 0.04% pump, and 55 received vehicle. At week 12, there was significantly greater improvement in the least-squares mean change in noninflammatory lesions with TMG 0.04% than with vehicle (-19.9 vs -9.7, p = 0.04) and a significant difference in Investigator Global Assessment of improvement at week 12 between the children treated with TMG 0.04% pump and those treated with vehicle (p = 0.02), but there were no discernible differences in static acne severity scales. Change from baseline in signs and symptoms of cutaneous irritation were similar between the active and vehicle arms at week 12. This study demonstrated statistically significant differences in the reduction of noninflammatory lesions between TMG 0.04% pump and vehicle in patients aged 911 with acne vulgaris. Additional studies are warranted to further characterize the safety and efficacy of TMG 0.04% pump for the treatment of acne in the preadolescent population.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 604
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tretinoin Nanogel 0.025% Versus Conventional Gel 0.025% in Patients with Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized, Active Controlled, Multicentre, Parallel Group, Phase IV Clinical Trial
    Chandrashekhar, B. S.
    Anitha, M.
    Ruparelia, Mukesh
    Vaidya, Pradyumna
    Aamir, Riyaz
    Shah, Sunil
    Thilak, S.
    Aurangabadkar, Sanjeev
    Pal, Sandeep
    Saraswat, Abir
    Sanmukhani, Jayesh J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (01) : WC4 - WC9
  • [32] Randomized Tolerability Analysis of Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%- Tretinoin 0.025% Gel Used With Benzoyl Peroxide Wash 4% for Acne Vulgaris
    Draelos, Zoe Diana
    Potts, Aaron
    Saenz, Alessandra B. Alio
    CUTIS, 2010, 86 (06): : 310 - 318
  • [33] Observational Study of Clindamycin Phosphate and Tretinoin Gel for the Treatment of Acne
    Ohison, Johan
    Dakovic, Rada
    Berg, Mats
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 18 (04) : 328 - 334
  • [34] Community-based trial results of combination clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 5% topical gel plus tretinoin microsphere gel 0.04% to 0.1% or adapalene gel 0.1% in the treatment of moderate to severe acne
    Kircik, Leon
    CUTIS, 2007, 80 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [35] Lower concentration of tretinoin microsphere gel (TMG 0.040%) may optimize treatment of acne vulgaris among younger patients, 11-16 years
    Jorizzo, J
    Eichenfield, L
    Webster, G
    Leyden, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 54 (03) : AB29 - AB29
  • [36] Efficacy and safety comparison of combination of 0.04% tretinoin microspheres plus 1% clindamycin versus their monotherapy in patients with acne vulgaris: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study
    Dogra, Sunil
    Sumathy, T. K.
    Nayak, Chitra
    Ravichandran, G.
    Vaidya, Pradyumna Prakash
    Mehta, Suyog
    Mittal, Rajan
    Mane, Amey
    Charugulla, Sujeet Narayan
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2021, 32 (08) : 925 - 933
  • [37] A comparison of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A multicenter trial
    Shalita, A
    Weiss, JS
    Chalker, DK
    Ellis, CN
    Greenspan, A
    Katz, HI
    Kantor, I
    Millikan, LE
    Swinehart, T
    Swinyer, L
    Whitmore, C
    Baker, M
    Czemielewski, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 34 (03) : 482 - 485
  • [38] A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials
    Cunliffe, WJ
    Poncet, M
    Loesche, C
    Verschoore, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 139 : 48 - 56
  • [39] Tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for photodamaged facial skin: A placebo-controlled trial
    Weiss, Jonathan S.
    Shavin, Joel S.
    Nighland, Marge
    Grossman, Rachel
    CUTIS, 2006, 78 (06): : 426 - 432
  • [40] Tazarotene Foam versus Tazarotene Gel: A Randomized Relative Bioavailability Study in Acne Vulgaris
    Jarratt, Michael
    Werner, Cary P.
    Saenz, Alessandra B. Alio
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2013, 33 (04) : 283 - 289