Quantitative structure-retention relationship model for predicting retention indices of constituents of essential oils of Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae)

被引:6
|
作者
Driouche, Youssouf [1 ]
Messadi, Djelloul [1 ]
机构
[1] Badji Mokhtar Annaba Univ, Environm & Food Safety Lab, BP 12, Annaba 23000, Algeria
关键词
essential oils; retention indices; QSRR; multiple linear regression; Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae); ANTIBACTERIAL; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.2298/JSC180817010D
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In this paper, a quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) model was developed for predicting the retention indices (log RI) of 36 constituents of essential oils. First, the chemical structure of each compound was sketched using HyperChem software. Then, molecular descriptors covering different information of molecular structures were calculated by Dragon software. The results illustrated that linear techniques, such as multiple linear regression (MLR), combined with a successful variable selection procedure are capable of generating an efficient QSRR model for predicting the retention indices of different compounds. This model, with high statistical significance (R-2 = 0.9781, Q(LOO)(2) = 0.9691, Q(ext)(2) = 0.9546, Q(L(5)O)(2) = 0.9667, F = 245.27), could be used adequately for the prediction and description of the retention indices of other essential oil compounds. The reliability of the proposed model was further illustrated using various evaluation techniques: leave-5-out cross-validation, bootstrap, randomization test and validation through the test set.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 416
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship Prediction of Kovats Retention Index of Some Organic Acids
    Fatemi, M. H.
    Elyasi, M.
    ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, 2013, 25 (03) : 411 - 422
  • [32] Quantitative study of the structure-retention index relationship in the imine family
    Acevedo-Martínez, J
    Escalona-Arranz, JC
    Villar-Rojas, A
    Téllez-Palmero, F
    Pérez-Rosés, R
    González, L
    Carrasco-Velar, R
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1102 (1-2) : 238 - 244
  • [33] Quantitative structure-retention relationship modeling of gas chromatographic retention times based on thermodynamic data
    Ebrahimi-Najafabadi, Heshmatollah
    McGinitie, Teague M.
    Harynuk, James J.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2014, 1358 : 225 - 231
  • [34] Predicting retention indices of PAHs in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: Quantitative structure retention relationship approach
    Bouarra, Nabil
    Nadji, Nawel
    Nouri, Loubna
    Boudjemaa, Amel
    Bachari, Khaldoun
    Messadi, Dejlloul
    JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 86 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [35] Quantitative Structure-retention Relationship Study on the GC-MS Retention Time of Illicit Drugs
    夏彬彬
    王彦吉
    杨瑞琴
    张晓昀
    结构化学, 2010, 29 (12) : 1879 - 1885
  • [36] A quantitative structure-retention relationship study for prediction of chromatographic relative retention time of chlorinated monoterpenes
    Ghasemi, Jahan B.
    Ahmadi, Sh.
    Brown, S. D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2011, 9 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [37] Quantitative structure-retention relationship for the Kovats retention indices of a large set of terpenes: A combined data splitting-feature selection strategy
    Hemmateenejad, Bahram
    Javadnia, Katayoun
    Elyasi, Maryam
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 592 (01) : 72 - 81
  • [38] Quantitative Structure-retention Relationship Study on the GC-MS Retention Time of Illicit Drugs
    Xia Bin-Bin
    Wang Yan-Ji
    Yang Rui-Qin
    Zhang Xiao-Yun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (12) : 1879 - 1885
  • [39] Evaluation of the solvation parameter model as a quantitative structure-retention relationship model for gas and liquid chromatography
    Poole, Colin F.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1626
  • [40] A sparse QSRR model for predicting retention indices of essential oils based on robust screening approach
    Al-Fakih, A. M.
    Algamal, Z. Y.
    Lee, M. H.
    Aziz, M.
    SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (08) : 691 - 703