Privacy protection vs. utility in visual data An objective evaluation framework

被引:19
|
作者
Erdelyi, Adam [1 ]
Winkler, Thomas [2 ]
Rinner, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Alpen Adria Univ, Klagenfurt & Lakeside Labs, Inst Networked & Embedded Syst, Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Ams AG, Tobelbader Str 30, A-8141 Premstaetten, Austria
关键词
Visual privacy; Video surveillance; Privacy evaluation framework; Privacy/utility trade-off; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-016-4337-7
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ubiquitous and networked sensors impose a huge challenge for privacy protection which has become an emerging problem of modern society. Protecting the privacy of visual data is particularly important due to the omnipresence of cameras, and various protection mechanisms for captured images and videos have been proposed. This paper introduces an objective evaluation framework in order to assess such protection methods. Visual privacy protection is typically realised by obfuscating sensitive image regions which often results in some loss of utility. Our evaluation framework assesses the achieved privacy protection and utility by comparing the performance of standard computer vision tasks, such as object recognition, detection and tracking on protected and unprotected visual data. The proposed framework extends the traditional frame-by-frame evaluation approach by introducing two new approaches based on aggregated and fused frames. We demonstrate our framework on eight differently protected video-sets and measure the trade-off between the improved privacy protection due to obfuscating captured image data and the degraded utility of the visual data. Results provided by our objective evaluation method are compared with an available state-of-the-art subjective study of these eight protection techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2312
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PRUDEnce: a System for Assessing Privacy Risk vs Utility in Data Sharing Ecosystems
    Pratesi, Francesca
    Monreale, Anna
    Trasarti, Roberto
    Giannotti, Fosca
    Pedreschi, Dino
    Yanagihara, Tadashi
    TRANSACTIONS ON DATA PRIVACY, 2018, 11 (02) : 139 - 167
  • [32] Differential privacy protection scheme supporting high data utility and fault tolerance
    Zhang L.
    Zhang J.
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53 (08): : 1496 - 1505
  • [33] JPEG-based scalable privacy protection and image data utility preservation
    Ruchaud, Natacha
    Dugelay, Jean-Luc
    IET SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 12 (07) : 881 - 887
  • [34] Incorporating privacy by design in Body Sensor Networks for Medical Applications: A Privacy and Data Protection Framework
    Kalloniatis, Christos
    Lambrinoudakis, Costas
    Musahl, Mathias
    Kanatas, Athanasios
    Gritzalis, Stefanos
    COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 18 (01) : 323 - 347
  • [35] A general framework for managing and processing live video data with privacy protection
    Alexander J. Aved
    Kien A. Hua
    Multimedia Systems, 2012, 18 : 123 - 143
  • [36] A general framework for managing and processing live video data with privacy protection
    Aved, Alexander J.
    Hua, Kien A.
    MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, 2012, 18 (02) : 123 - 143
  • [37] A legal framework for an elderly healthcare platform: A privacy and data protection overview
    Costa, Angelo
    Yelshyna, Aliaksandra
    Moreira, Teresa C.
    Andrade, Francisco C. P.
    Julian, Vicente
    Novais, Paulo
    COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2017, 33 (05) : 647 - 658
  • [38] PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION CONCERNS IN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF SLOVENIAN ENERGY LAW
    Dimovic, Zoran
    LEXONOMICA, 2023, 15 (01): : 53 - 76
  • [39] Privacy protection framework for open data: Constructing and assessing an effective approach
    Tang, Yunjie
    LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 46 (03)
  • [40] Blockchain-based AMI framework for data security and privacy protection
    Tian, Hongliang
    Jian, Yuzhi
    Ge, Xiaonan
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2022, 32