Cycle Time Metrics for Multisite Clinical Trials in the United States

被引:14
|
作者
Abbott, Diana [1 ]
Califf, Robert [1 ]
Morrison, Briggs W. [2 ]
Pierre, Christine [3 ]
Bolte, Jean [1 ]
Chakraborty, Swati [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Translat Med Inst, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[3] RxTrials Inc, Ellicott City, MD USA
关键词
trials; metrics; study start-up; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; RESEARCH ENTERPRISE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; BOARD; MULTICENTER; CHALLENGES; CANCER; PARTICIPATION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1177/2168479012464371
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Conducting randomized controlled trials entails a prolonged, costly study start-up (SSU) process that may create significant delays. Optimizing the operational aspects of multisite trials requires identifying benchmarks in the SSU process and the potential delays associated with them. We engaged in a collaborative effort to identify and describe key SSU intervals that correspond with necessary procedures and processes for activating multisite clinical trials in the US. After developing definitions for SSU benchmarks and obtaining data from research coordinating entities, we identified factors that were significantly associated with reduced cycle times, including the use of central institutional review boards for study approval and status as a private practice or independent research site. However, small sample sizes and large proportions of missing data hamper the interpretability of our results. Future development of standard measures of SSU efficiency will be critical to analyzing and improving study initiation processes at US research sites.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 160
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH THE HEXITOL DERIVATIVES IN THE UNITED-STATES
    CHIUTEN, DF
    ROZENCWEIG, M
    VONHOFF, DD
    MUGGIA, FM
    CANCER, 1981, 47 (03) : 442 - 451
  • [22] Using Central IRBs for Multicenter Clinical Trials in the United States
    Flynn, Kathryn E.
    Hahn, Cynthia L.
    Kramer, Judith M.
    Check, Devon K.
    Dombeck, Carrie B.
    Bang, Soo
    Perlmutter, Jane
    Khin-Maung-Gyi, Felix A.
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [23] Current clinical trials in germ cell tumours in the United States
    Nichols, CR
    GERM CELL TUMOURS V, 2002, : 95 - 98
  • [24] Representation of minorities in clinical trials for migraine in the United States and Europe
    Robbins, N.
    Tepper, S.
    Bernat, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 117 - 118
  • [25] Why the United States Needs a Network for Stroke Clinical Trials
    Landis, Story
    Fisher, Marc
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (05) : 1217 - 1218
  • [26] The landscape of precision cancer medicine clinical trials in the United States
    Roper, Nitin
    Stensland, Kristian D.
    Hendricks, Ryan
    Galsky, Matthew D.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2015, 41 (05) : 385 - 390
  • [27] Running the enrollment numbers on ophthalmic clinical trials in the United States
    Pucker, Andrew D.
    Derthick, Nicole
    Scott, Lanita
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2024, 101 (08) : 523 - 529
  • [28] Rescuing clinical trials in the United States and beyond: A call for action
    Eapen, Zubin J.
    Vavalle, John P.
    Granger, Christopher B.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Califf, Robert M.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 165 (06) : 837 - 847
  • [29] Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States
    Sertkaya, Aylin
    Wong, Hui-Hsing
    Jessup, Amber
    Beleche, Trinidad
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [30] FEMALES WITH BLADDER CANCER ARE UNDERREPRESENTED IN CLINICAL TRIALS IN THE UNITED STATES
    Myers, Amanda A.
    Steinmetz, Alexis R.
    Grajales, Valentina
    Bree, Kelly K.
    Duan, Zhigang
    Makaraoff, Lydia
    Kamat, Ashish M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1135 - E1135