Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll

被引:166
|
作者
Cody, Emily M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reagan, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Lewis [4 ]
Dodds, Peter Sheridan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Danforth, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Computat Story Lab, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Vermont Complex Syst Ctr, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Math & Stat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Math Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SOCIAL MEDIA; MASS-MEDIA; BELIEF; WEATHER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0136092
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The consequences of anthropogenic climate change are extensively debated through scientific papers, newspaper articles, and blogs. Newspaper articles may lack accuracy, while the severity of findings in scientific papers may be too opaque for the public to understand. Social media, however, is a forum where individuals of diverse backgrounds can share their thoughts and opinions. As consumption shifts from old media to new, Twitter has become a valuable resource for analyzing current events and headline news. In this research, we analyze tweets containing the word "climate" collected between September 2008 and July 2014. Through use of a previously developed sentiment measurement tool called the Hedonometer, we determine how collective sentiment varies in response to climate change news, events, and natural disasters. We find that natural disasters, climate bills, and oil-drilling can contribute to a decrease in happiness while climate rallies, a book release, and a green ideas contest can contribute to an increase in happiness. Words uncovered by our analysis suggest that responses to climate change news are predominately from climate change activists rather than climate change deniers, indicating that Twitter is a valuable resource for the spread of climate change awareness.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Twitter Opinion Mining and Boosting Using Sentiment Analysis
    Geetha, R.
    Rekha, Pasupuleti
    Karthika, S.
    2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICCCSP): SPECIAL FOCUS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR SMART ENVIRONMENT, 2018, : 174 - 177
  • [42] Sentiment and Opinion Analysis on Twitter about Local Airlines
    Samonte, Mary Jane C.
    Garcia, John Michael R.
    Lucero, Valerie Jade L.
    Santos, Shayann Celine B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICCIP 2017), 2017, : 415 - 422
  • [43] Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis on a Twitter Data Stream
    Gokulakrishnan, Balakrishnan
    Priyanthan, Pavalanathan
    Ragavan, Thiruchittampalam
    Prasath, Nadarajah
    Perera, A. Shehan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ICT FOR EMERGING REGIONS (ICTER2012), 2012, : 182 - 188
  • [44] Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide
    Kirilenko, Andrei P.
    Stepchenkova, Svetlana O.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 171 - 182
  • [45] A novel sentiment analysis framework for monitoring the evolving public opinion in real-time: Case study on climate change
    El Barachi, May
    AlKhatib, Manar
    Mathew, Sujith
    Oroumchian, Farhad
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 312
  • [46] Twitter and climate change
    Fownes, Jennifer R.
    Yu, Chao
    Margolin, Drew B.
    SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2018, 12 (06):
  • [47] Text Mining Attitudes toward Climate Change: Emotion and Sentiment Analysis of the Twitter Corpus
    Mi, Zhewei
    Zhan, Hongwei
    WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2023, 15 (02) : 277 - 287
  • [48] The Qatar World Cup and Twitter sentiment: Unraveling the interplay of soft power, public opinion, and media scrutiny
    Hassan, Ahmed A. M.
    Wang, Jia
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR THE SOCIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2024, 59 (05) : 679 - 704
  • [49] The Pulse of Democracy: The Public Opinion Poll and How It Works
    Gosnell, Harold F.
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1941, 5 (02) : 341 - 343
  • [50] ELECTRONIC PUBLIC-OPINION POLL GUIDES LEGISLATORS
    STEFANIDES, EJ
    DESIGN NEWS, 1976, 32 (21) : 24 - 25