Review and downscaling of life cycle decision support tools for the procurement of low-value products

被引:7
|
作者
Nowack, Martin [1 ]
Hoppe, Holger [2 ]
Guenther, Edeltraud [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Business & Econ, Chair Environm Management & Accounting, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Schott Solar AG, D-63755 Alzenau, Germany
来源
关键词
Decision vector; Eco-label; Environmental management system; LCA; Life cycle management instruments; Operation room textiles; Procurement; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0401-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this article, we analyze how environmental aspects can be derived from life cycle management instruments for procurement decisions of low-value products. For our analysis, we chose the case of operating room textiles. The review includes the life cycle management instruments: life cycle assessment, environmental labels, and management systems applied within the textile industry. We do so in order to identify the most important environmental decision criteria based on which the procurer of low-value products can decide for the most environmentally friendly option. We conducted a systematic literature search in the relevant literature databases. We critically evaluate the identified life cycle assessment studies for sound methodology, verifiability, completeness, and actuality. Based on this review, we analyze and compare the results of the three most comprehensive studies in more detail and derive the most important environmental aspects of operating room textiles. In a second step, we extend the operational perspective via the strategic perspective, namely environmental management systems and further existing life cycle instruments such as eco-labels. We then synthesize the gathered information into a decision vector. Finally, we discuss how the gathered data can be further exploited and give suggestions for a more sophisticated assessment. The review of the existing life cycle assessments on operating room textiles showed that procurers should not base their decisions exclusively on existing life cycle assessments. In addition to problems such as methodological weakness, incompleteness, outdated data, and poor verifiability, the information provided is far too complex to prepare procurement decisions regarding low-value products. Furthermore, the results for the textiles assessed in the existing life cycle assessments are not necessarily transferrable to the textiles considered by the procurer because of restrictive assumptions. Therefore, it is necessary to downscale the available information and synthesize it in an applicable decision support tool. Our decision vector consists of the key environmental aspects water, CO2, energy, and waste and is completed by environmental management systems, eco-labels, and the countries of origin that matters for environmental and social aspects as well. The decision vector supports procurers when considering environmental aspects in procurement decisions and provides a mechanism for balancing the information between overcomplexity and oversimplification. Therefore, it should be the basis for future development of an eco-label for operating room textiles.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 665
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Web-based tools in support of life cycle engineering of telecommunications products
    Palmer, PJ
    Williams, DJ
    Dixon, AC
    TWENTY FIRST IEEE/CPMT INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM, 1997, : 134 - 139
  • [12] Refurbishment decision support tools review-Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects
    Ferreira, Joaquim
    Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte
    de Brito, Jorge
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1453 - 1460
  • [13] Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review
    Kjelle, Elin
    Brandsaeter, Ingrid ofsti
    Andersen, Eivind Richter
    Hofmann, Bjorn Morten
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2024, 22 (04) : 485 - 501
  • [14] The Need for More Effective Tools to Decrease Use of Low-Value Care
    Mott, Nicole M.
    Chaitoff, Alexander M.
    Kullgren, Jeffrey T.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (11)
  • [15] A critical review of "green" procurement Life cycle analysis of food products within the supply chain
    Beer, Sean
    Lemmer, Christian
    WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2011, 3 (03) : 229 - 244
  • [16] LIFE CYCLE DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS: THE USE OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES IN COMBATING DECISION TOOL 'PERFORMANCE DECAY'
    Lattanzio, Susan
    Newnes, Linda
    McManus, Marcelle
    Dunkley, Derrick
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 4, 2016,
  • [17] Proposal of decision support method for life cycle strategy by estimating value and physical lifetimes
    Daimon, T
    Kondoh, S
    Umeda, Y
    2003 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DESIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING - ECODESIGN '03, 2003, : 109 - 116
  • [18] Promise and perils of patient decision aids for reducing low-value care
    Thompson, Rachel
    Muscat, Danielle M.
    Jansen, Jesse
    Cox, Darlene
    Zadro, Joshua R.
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (05) : 407 - 411
  • [19] Decision support tools in low back pain
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    van Hooff, Miranda L.
    de Kleuver, Marinus
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06): : 1084 - 1097
  • [20] Sustainability in healthcare by reducing low-value imaging - A narrative review
    Kjelle, E.
    Brandsaeter, I. O.
    Andersen, E. R.
    Hofmann, B.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 : S30 - S34