Pancreatogastrostomy With Gastric Partition After Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy Versus Conventional Pancreatojejunostomy A Prospective Randomized Study

被引:154
|
作者
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano [1 ]
Cosa, Rebeca [1 ]
Blanco, Laia [1 ]
Lopez-Boado, Miguel Angel [1 ]
Astudillo, Emiliano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dept Surg, ICMDM, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefc7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the results of postoperative morbidity rate of a new pancreatogastrostomy technique, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with gastric partition (PPPD-GP) with the conventional technique of pancreaticojejunostomy, (PJ). Summary and Background Data: Pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy (PG) are the commonly preferred methods of anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). All randomized controlled trials failed to show advantage of a particular technique, suggesting that both PJ and PG provide equally results. However, postoperative morbidity remains high. The best technique in pancreatic anastomosis is still debated. Method: Described here is a new technique, PPPD-GP; in this technique the gastroepiploic arcade is preserved. Gastric partition was performed using 2 endo-Gia staplers along the greater curvature of the stomach, 3 cm from the border. This gastric segment, 10 to 12 cm in length is placed in close proximity to the cut edge of the pancreatic slump. An end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (with pancreatic duct stent) is constructed. One hundred eight patients undergoing PPPD for benign and malignant diseases of the pancreatic head and the periampullary region were randomized to receive PG (PPPD-GP) or end-to-side PJ (PPPD-PJ). Results: The two treatment groups showed no differences in preoperative parameters and intraoperative factors. The overall postoperative complications were 23% after PPPD-GP and 44% after PPPD-PJ (P < 0.01). The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 4% after PPPD-GP and 18% after PPPD-PJ (P < 0.01). The mean + SD hospital stay was 12 +/- 2 days after PPPD-GP and 16 +/- 3 days after PPPD-PJ. Conclusions: This study shows that PPPD-GP can be performed safely and is associated with less complication than PPPD-PJ. The advantage of this technique over other PG techniques is that the anastomosis is outside the area of the stomach where the contents empty into the jejunum, but pancreatic juice drains directly into the stomach.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 938
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus Conventional Whipple Operation
    Valerio Di Carlo
    Alessandro Zerbi
    Gianpaolo Balzano
    Vittorio Corso
    World Journal of Surgery, 1999, 23 (9) : 920 - 925
  • [42] Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is strongly related to other postoperative complications
    Hartwig Riediger
    Frank Makowiec
    Wolfgang D. Schareck
    Ulrich T. Hopt
    Ulrich Adam
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003, 7 : 758 - 765
  • [43] Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is strongly related to other postoperative complications
    Riediger, H
    Makowiec, F
    Schareck, WD
    Hopt, UT
    Adam, U
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (06) : 758 - 765
  • [44] Braun enteroenterostomy reduces delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective review
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Ohtsuka, Takao
    Kimura, Hideyo
    Matsunaga, Taketo
    Tamura, Koji
    Ideno, Noboru
    Aso, Teppei
    Miyasaka, Yoshihiro
    Ueda, Junji
    Takahata, Shunichi
    Tanaka, Masao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 209 (02): : 369 - 377
  • [45] Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: Influence of a Billroth I versus a Billroth II type of reconstruction on gastric emptying
    Goei, TH
    Henegouwen, MIV
    Slooff, MJH
    van Gulik, TM
    Gouma, DJ
    Eddes, EH
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 18 (05) : 376 - 380
  • [46] Drainage versus resection in surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: Prospective randomized trial comparing the Frey procedure with pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy
    Izbicki, JR
    Bloechle, C
    Broering, DC
    Knoefel, WT
    Kuechler, T
    Broelsch, CE
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A471 - A471
  • [47] Intraoperative Endoluminal Pyloromyotomy Versus Stretching of the Pylorus for the Reduction of Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pylorus-Preserving Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (PORRIDGE Study; DRKS00013503)
    Schrempf, Matthias C.
    Anthuber, Matthias
    Spatz, Johann
    Sommer, Florian
    Vlasenko, Dmytro
    Geissler, Bernd
    Wolf, Sebastian
    Schiele, Stefan
    Pinto, David R. M.
    Hoffmann, Michael
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [48] Comparison of quality of life after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and Whipple resection
    Ohtsuka, T
    Yamaguchi, K
    Ohuchida, J
    Inoue, K
    Nagai, E
    Chijiiwa, K
    Tanaka, M
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 50 (51) : 846 - 850
  • [49] Pancreatic carcinoma in the pancreaticogastrostomy site after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for IPMN
    Kato, Koichi
    Takeda, Shin
    Inoue, Soichiro
    Nomoto, Shoji
    Kanazumi, Naohito
    Nakao, Akimasa
    PANCREAS, 2007, 35 (01) : 87 - 87
  • [50] Comparative effects of enteric-coated pancreatin microsphere therapy after conventional and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy
    Bruno, MJ
    Borm, JJJ
    Hoek, FJ
    Delzenne, B
    Hofmann, AF
    deGoeij, JJM
    vanRoyen, EA
    vanGulik, TM
    deWit, LT
    Gouma, DJ
    vanLeeuwen, DJ
    Tytgat, GNJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (07) : 952 - 956