Dual-Energy CT in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:4
|
作者
Braegelmann, A. [1 ]
Bunck, A. [1 ,2 ]
Donas, K. [3 ]
Kasprzak, B. [3 ]
Maintz, D. [1 ,2 ]
Heindel, W. [1 ]
Seifarth, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Klin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Koln, Inst & Poliklin Radiol Diagnost, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Vaskulare & Endovaskulare Chirurg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
aorta; CT angiography; aneurysm; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; EVAR;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1330447
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study investigates the dual-energy procedure for postoperative CT follow-up scans after endovascularly treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The procedure is analyzed with respect to its sensitivity and specificity as well as the associated radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: 51 examinations were carried out on 47 patients between February 2009 and March 2010. For each patient, a non-enhanced, an arterial and a venous scan were conducted, the latter two using the dual-energy technology. Virtual images for the non-enhanced phase were reconstructed from the data taken in the venous phase. Protocol A, the reference standard, consisted of non-enhanced images and images of the arterial and venous phase. In protocol B, standard non-enhanced images were replaced by the reconstructed virtual non-enhanced images. Protocol C consisted only of virtual non-enhanced and 80 kV images taken during the venous phase. All data was anonymized and evaluated by two independent radiologists. For protocol C, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed. The effective radiation dosage was determined for each scan. Results: All endoleaks identified in protocol A were found using protocols B and C. For protocol C, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100%, the specificity was 94.1%, and the positive predictive value was 89.5%. Compared to protocol A, protocol C reduces the radiation exposure by 62.45%. Conclusion: A scan protocol consisting of virtual non-enhanced images as well as 80 kV images taken during the venous phase was found to be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing endoleaks, while reducing the radiation exposure by 62.45%.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contemporary imaging methods for the follow-up after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair: a review
    Kazimierczak, Wojciech
    Serafin, Zbigniew
    Kazimierczak, Natalia
    Ratajczak, Przemyslaw
    Leszczynski, Waldemar
    Bryl, Lukasz
    Lemanowicz, Adam
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2019, 14 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [42] Feasibility of Dual-Energy CT in the Arterial Phase: Imaging After Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Numburi, Uma D.
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    Flamm, Scott D.
    Greenberg, Roy K.
    Primak, Andrew N.
    Saba, Osama I.
    Lieber, Michael L.
    Halliburton, Sandra S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) : 486 - 493
  • [43] Review of Clinical Applications of Dual-Energy CT in Patients after Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Kazimierczak, Wojciech
    Kazimierczak, Natalia
    Serafin, Zbigniew
    Teraa, Martin
    Hazenberg, Constantijn E. V. B.
    Zimmermann, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24)
  • [44] Role of multidetector CT angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in redefining follow-up protocols after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Motta, R.
    Rubaltelli, L.
    Vezzaro, R.
    Vida, V.
    Marchesi, P.
    Stramare, R.
    Zanon, A.
    Battistel, M.
    Sommavilla, M.
    Miotto, D.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (06): : 1079 - 1092
  • [45] Follow-up imaging experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm stents
    Khan, AM
    Jafri, SZ
    Khan, S
    Salem, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 125 - 125
  • [46] Complete ten-year follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Survival and causes of death
    Wibmer, Andreas
    Nolz, Richard
    Teufelsbauer, Harald
    Kretschmer, Georg
    Prusa, Alexander M.
    Funovics, Martin
    Lammer, Johannes
    Schoder, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (06) : 1203 - 1206
  • [47] Patient preferences for follow-up methods after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Engellau, L
    Larsson, EM
    Norgren, L
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2003, 22 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [48] A multidetector tomography protocol for follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Bastos, Roberto Moraes
    Razuk Filho, Alvaro
    Blasbalg, Roberto
    Caffaro, Roberto Augusto
    Karakhanian, Walter Khegan
    Rocha, Antonio Jose
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (12) : 2025 - 2029
  • [49] Imaging Follow-up of Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Dual-Source, Dual-Energy CT and Late Delayed-Phase Scans
    Flors, Lucia
    Leiva-Salinas, Carlos
    Norton, Patrick T.
    Patrie, James T.
    Hagspiel, Klaus D.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (03) : 435 - 442
  • [50] The case for lifelong follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Muthu, Carl
    Gordon, Malcolm
    Buckenham, Tim
    Lewis, David
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 118 (1225) : 53 - 56