Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Systems: A Vehicle Dynamics Benchmark

被引:16
|
作者
Callejo, Alfonso [1 ]
Dopico, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Aerosp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ A Coruna, Lab Ingn Mecan, Mendizabal S-N, Ferrol 15403, Spain
来源
关键词
DIFFERENTIAL-ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; SOFTWARE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4041960
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Algorithms for the sensitivity analysis of multibody systems are quickly maturing as computational and software resources grow. Indeed, the area has made substantial progress since the first academic methods and examples were developed. Today, sensitivity analysis tools aimed at gradient-based design optimization are required to be as computationally efficient and scalable as possible. This paper presents extensive verification of one of the most popular sensitivity analysis techniques, namely the direct differentiation method (DDM). Usage of such method is recommended when the number of design parameters relative to the number of outputs is small and when the time integration algorithm is sensitive to accumulation errors. Verification is hereby accomplished through two radically different computational techniques, namely manual differentiation and automatic differentiation, which are used to compute the necessary partial derivatives. Experiments are conducted on an 18-degree-of-freedom, 366-dependent-coordinate bus model with realistic geometry and tire contact forces, which constitutes an unusually large system within general-purpose sensitivity analysis of multibody systems. The results are in good agreement; the manual technique provides shorter runtimes, whereas the automatic differentiation technique is easier to implement. The presented results highlight the potential of manual and automatic differentiation approaches within general-purpose simulation packages, and the importance of formulation benchmarking.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recursive inverse dynamics sensitivity analysis of open-tree-type multibody systems
    Altay Zhakatayev
    Yuriy Rogovchenko
    Matthias Pätzold
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2023, 111 : 11297 - 11313
  • [22] DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIBODY DYNAMICS FORD EXPEDITION MODEL FOR VEHICLE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
    Chan, Brendan J.
    Sandu, Corina
    DECT2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 5, 2009, : 729 - +
  • [23] TIME INTEGRATION INCORPORATED SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS WITH GENERALIZED-α METHOD FOR MULTIBODY DYNAMICS SYSTEMS
    Dong, Guang
    Ma, Zheng-Dong
    Hulbert, Gregory
    Kikuchi, Noboru
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2011, VOL 7, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 599 - 605
  • [24] Recursive inverse dynamics sensitivity analysis of open-tree-type multibody systems
    Zhakatayev, Altay
    Rogovchenko, Yuriy
    Paetzold, Matthias
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2023, 111 (12) : 11297 - 11313
  • [25] Multibody dynamics modeling of electromagnetic direct-drive vehicle robot driver
    Chen, Gang
    Zhang, Weigong
    Yu, Bing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 14 (05):
  • [26] Calculation of Critical Speed of Railway Vehicle by Multibody Dynamics Analysis
    Kang, Juseok
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, 2013, 37 (11) : 1371 - 1377
  • [27] REPORT ON THE HERBERTOV WORKSHOP ON MULTIBODY SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS TO PROBLEMS IN VEHICLE DYNAMICS
    SHARP, RS
    KORTUM, W
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1991, 20 (01) : 56 - 56
  • [29] Graph-Theoretic Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Systems
    Banerjee, Joydeep M.
    McPhee, John J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [30] Sensitivity analysis for multibody systems formulated on a Lie group
    Valentin Sonneville
    Olivier Brüls
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2014, 31 : 47 - 67