Alliances and corporate governance

被引:53
作者
Bodnaruk, Andriy [1 ]
Massa, Massimo [2 ]
Simonov, Andrei [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] INSEAD, Dept Finance, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Gaidar Inst Econ Policy, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Alliances; Corporate governance; Abnormal return; Profitability; INTERNAL CAPITAL-MARKETS; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; JOINT-VENTURES; BOUNDARIES; OWNERSHIP; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We study the link between a firm's quality of governance and its alliance activity. We consider alliances as a commitment technology that helps a company' Chief Executive Officer overcome agency problems that relate to the inability to ex ante motivate division managers. We show that well-governed firms are more likely to avail themselves of this technology to anticipate ex post commitment problems and resolve them. The role of governance is particularly important when the commitment problems are more acute, such as for significantly risky/long-horizon projects ("Iongshots") or firms more prone to inefficient internal redistribution of resources (conglomerates), as well as in the absence of alternative disciplining devices (e.g., low product market competition). Governance also mitigates agency issues between alliance partners; dominant alliance partners agree to a more equal split of power with junior partners that are better governed. An "experiment" that induces cross-sectional variation in the cost of the alliance commitment technology provides evidence of a causal link between governance and alliances. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 693
页数:23
相关论文
共 44 条
[41]   Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources [J].
Stein, JC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :111-133
[43]  
Williamson O. E., 1996, The mechanisms of governance
[44]   SATISFICING, SELECTION, AND INNOVATING REMNANT [J].
WINTER, SG .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1971, 85 (02) :237-261