Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry spine scans to determine abdominal fat in postmenopausal women

被引:3
|
作者
Bea, J. W. [1 ,2 ]
Blew, R. M. [2 ]
Going, S. B. [2 ]
Hsu, C. -H. [3 ]
Lee, M. C. [2 ]
Lee, V. R. [2 ]
Caan, B. J. [4 ]
Kwan, M. L. [4 ]
Lohman, T. G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Med, Ctr Canc, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Nutr Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente No Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Physiol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
adiposity; body composition; obesity; risk prediction; body mass index; BODY-MASS INDEX; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; VISCERAL FAT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ADIPOSE-TISSUE; BREAST-CANCER; DXA; RISK; ANTHROPOMETRY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/ajhb.22892
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Body composition may be a better predictor of chronic disease risk than body mass index (BMI) in older populations. Objectives: We sought to validate spine fat fraction (%) from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) spine scans as a proxy for total abdominal fat. Methods: Total body DXA scan abdominal fat regions of interest (ROI) that have been previously validated by magnetic resonance imaging were assessed among healthy, postmenopausal women who also had antero-posterior spine scans (n = 103). ROIs were (1) lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 and (2) L2-Iliac Crest (L2-IC), manually selected by two independent raters, and (3) trunk, auto-selected by DXA software. Intra-class correlation coefficients evaluated intra and inter-rater reliability on a random subset (N = 25). Linear regression models, validated by bootstrapping, assessed the relationship between spine fat fraction (%) and total abdominal fat (%) ROIs. Results: Mean age, BMI, and total body fat were 66.1 +/- 4.8 y, 25.8 +/- 3.8 kg/m(2) and 40.0 +/- 6.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences within or between raters. Linear regression models adjusted for several participant and scan characteristics were equivalent to using only BMI and spine fat fraction. The model predicted L2-L4 (Adj. R-2: 0.83) and L2-IC (Adj. R-2: 0.84) abdominal fat (%) well; the adjusted R-2 for trunk fat (%) was 0.78. Model validation demonstrated minimal over-fitting (Adj. R-2: 0.82, 0.83, and 0.77 for L2-L4, L2-IC, and trunk fat, respectively). Conclusions: The strong correlation between spine fat fraction and DXA abdominal fat measures make it suitable for further development in postmenopausal chronic disease risk prediction models.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 926
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Precision error of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at spine, hip, and forearm
    Henzell, S
    Dhaliwal, S
    Pontifex, R
    Gill, F
    Price, R
    Retallack, R
    Prince, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [42] The difference in spine specimen dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density between in situ and in vitro scans
    Tan, Juay Seng
    Kayanja, Mark M.
    St Clair, Selvon F.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (09): : 784 - 788
  • [43] MEASUREMENT OF THE CALCANEUS BY ULTRASOUND AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS
    NAYLOR, KE
    LANGTON, CM
    SMITH, TWD
    EASTELL, R
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 : S353 - S353
  • [44] BONE DENSITOMETRY OF THE SPINE AND FEMUR IN CHILDREN BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    KROGER, H
    KOTANIEMI, A
    VAINIO, P
    ALHAVA, E
    BONE AND MINERAL, 1992, 17 (01): : 75 - 85
  • [45] Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision
    R. D. Blank
    D. G. Malone
    R. C. Christian
    N. L. Vallarta-Ast
    D. C. Krueger
    M. K. Drezner
    N. C. Binkley
    K. E. Hansen
    Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 : 768 - 774
  • [46] Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision
    Blank, RD
    Malone, DG
    Christian, RC
    Vallarta-Ast, NL
    Krueger, DC
    Drezner, MK
    Binkley, NC
    Hansen, KE
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (05) : 768 - 774
  • [47] Pitfalls of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in dialysis: Beware the lumbar spine.
    Stein, MS
    Packham, DK
    Ebeling, PR
    Wark, JD
    Becker, GJ
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 51 (04) : 1329 - 1329
  • [48] Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women
    EG Kamel
    G McNeill
    TS Han
    FW Smith
    A Avenell
    L Davidson
    P Tothill
    International Journal of Obesity, 1999, 23 : 686 - 692
  • [49] Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women
    Kamel, EG
    McNeill, G
    Han, TS
    Smith, FW
    Avenell, A
    Davidson, L
    Tothill, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1999, 23 (07) : 686 - 692
  • [50] Increasing body fat mass reverses bone loss in osteopenia as detected by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans
    Hedges, William P.
    Bukhari, Marwan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 3 (01) : 1 - 4