共 50 条
A 2-Hour Diagnostic Protocol for Possible Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department A Randomized Clinical Trial
被引:139
|作者:
Than, Martin
[1
]
Aldous, Sally
[1
]
Lord, Sarah Jane
[2
]
Goodacre, Stephen
[3
,4
]
Frampton, Christopher M. A.
[5
]
Troughton, Richard
[5
]
George, Peter
[1
]
Florkowski, Christopher Michael
[6
]
Ardagh, Michael
[5
]
Smyth, David
[1
]
Jardine, David Lewis
[1
]
Peacock, William Frank
[7
]
Young, Joanna
[1
]
Hamilton, Gregory
[8
]
Deely, Joanne M.
[8
]
Cullen, Louise
[9
,10
]
Richards, A. Mark
[5
]
机构:
[1] Christchurch Hosp, Emergency Dept, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] No Gen Hosp, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
[6] Canterbury Hlth Labs, Christchurch, New Zealand
[7] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Canterbury Dist Hlth Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
[9] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Herston, Qld, Australia
[10] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词:
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME;
STANDARDIZED REPORTING GUIDELINES;
ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
TIMI RISK SCORE;
AMERICAN-COLLEGE;
ASSOCIATION;
CARE;
MANAGEMENT;
STRATIFICATION;
DEFINITIONS;
D O I:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11362
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
IMPORTANCE Patients with chest pain represent a high health care burden, but it may be possible to identify a patient group with a low short-term risk of adverse cardiac events who are suitable for early discharge. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of a rapid diagnostic pathway with a standard-care diagnostic pathway for the assessment of patients with possible cardiac chest pain in a usual clinical practice setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, randomized parallel-group trial with blinded outcome assessments was conducted in an academic general and tertiary hospital. Participants included adults with acute chest pain consistent with acute coronary syndrome for whom the attending physician planned further observation and troponin testing. Patient recruitment occurred from October 11, 2010, to July 4, 2012, with a 30-day follow-up. INTERVENTIONS An experimental pathway using an accelerated diagnostic protocol (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score, 0; electrocardiography; and 0- and 2-hour troponin tests) or a standard-care pathway (troponin test on arrival at hospital, prolonged observation, and a second troponin test 6-12 hours after onset of pain) serving as the control. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Discharge from the hospital within 6 hours without a major adverse cardiac event occurring within 30 days. RESULTS Fifty-two of 270 patients in the experimental group were successfully discharged within 6 hours compared with 30 of 272 patients in the control group (19.3% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.13; P = .008). It required 20 hours to discharge the same proportion of patients from the control group as achieved in the experimental group within 6 hours. In the experimental group, 35 additional patients (12.9%) were classified as low risk but admitted to an inpatient ward for cardiac investigation. None of the 35 patients received a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome after inpatient evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Using the accelerated diagnostic protocol in the experimental pathway almost doubled the proportion of patients with chest pain discharged early. Clinicians could discharge approximately 1 of 5 patients with chest pain to outpatient follow-up monitoring in less than 6 hours. This diagnostic strategy could be easily replicated in other centers because no extra resources are required.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文