Factors Predictive of Symptomatic Radiation Injury After Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

被引:16
|
作者
Herbert, Christopher [1 ]
Moiseenko, Vitali [2 ]
McKenzie, Michael [1 ]
Redekop, Gary [4 ]
Hsu, Fred [5 ]
Gete, Ermias [2 ]
Gill, Brad [2 ]
Lee, Richard [2 ]
Luchka, Kurt [2 ]
Haw, Charles [4 ]
Lee, Andrew [6 ]
Toyota, Brian [4 ]
Martin, Montgomery [3 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[3] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Imaging, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Radiat Oncol, Abbotsford, BC, Canada
[6] Royal Columbian Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, New Westminster, BC, Canada
关键词
Arteriovenous malformation; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Symptomatic radiation injury; Predictive factors; GRADING SYSTEM; COMPLICATIONS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate predictive factors in the development of symptomatic radiation injury after treatment with linear acceleratore-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracerebral arteriovenous malformations and relate the findings to the conclusions drawn by Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). Methods and Materials: Archived plans for 73 patients who were treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were studied. Actuarial estimates of freedom from radiation injury were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis of incidence of radiation injury. Log-rank test was used to search for dosimetric parameters associated with freedom from radiation injury. Results: Symptomatic radiation injury was exhibited by 14 of 73 patients (19.2%). Actuarial rate of symptomatic radiation injury was 23.0% at 4 years. Most patients (78.5%) had mild to moderate deficits according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. On univariate analysis, lesion volume and diameter, dose to isocenter, and a V-x for doses >= 8 Gy showed statistical significance. Only lesion diameter showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) in a multivariate model. According to the log-rank test, AVM volumes >5 cm(3) and diameters >30 mm were significantly associated with the risk of radiation injury (p < 0.01). The V-12 also showed strong association with the incidence of radiation injury. Actuarial incidence of radiation injury was 16.8% if V-12 was <28 cm(3) and 53.2% if >28 cm(3) (log-rank test, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that the risk of developing symptomatic radiation injury after radiosurgery is related to lesion diameter and volume and irradiated volume. Results suggest a higher tolerance than proposed by QUANTEC. The widely differing findings reported in the literature, however, raise considerable uncertainties. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 877
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Management of choroidal melanomas with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery
    Leung, SW
    Hsiung, CY
    Chen, HC
    Chen, HJ
    Lin, SA
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 77 (01): : 62 - 65
  • [12] Optimized beam planning for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery
    Lu, HM
    Kooy, HM
    Leber, ZH
    Ledoux, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (05): : 1183 - 1189
  • [13] Dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery systems
    Sharma, S. D.
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Dagaonkar, S. S.
    Bisht, Geetika
    Dayanand, S.
    Devi, Reena
    Deshpande, S. S.
    Chaudhary, S.
    Bhatt, B. C.
    Kannan, S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 32 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [14] Linear Accelerator-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
    Leeman, J.
    Clump, D. A.
    Wegner, R. E.
    Heron, D. E.
    Burton, S. A.
    Mintz, A. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S295 - S296
  • [15] Factors related to radiation injury after radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations of the brain
    De Salles, AAF
    Sun, BM
    Solberg, TD
    Cabatan-Awang, C
    Ford, JM
    Selch, MT
    RADIOSURGERY 1999, 2000, 3 : 168 - 172
  • [16] Feature Analysis of Predictors Affecting the Nidus Obliteration of Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations Using Explainable Predictive Modeling
    Kim, Kwang Hyeon
    Sohn, Moon-Jun
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [17] Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of acoustic neuromas
    Chinn, DM
    Adler, JR
    Hancock, SL
    Forster, KM
    Martin, DP
    Poen, JC
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 360 - 360
  • [18] COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING LINEAR ACCELERATOR BASED STEREOTACTIC RADIATION FOR CEREBRAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS
    Skjoth-Rasmussen, Jane
    Roed, Henrik
    Ohlhues, Lars
    Jespersen, Bo
    Juhler, Marianne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (02): : 542 - 547
  • [19] Intracranial arteriovenous malformations treated with linear accelerator-based conformal radiosurgery:: clinical outcome and prediction of obliteration
    Moreno-Jimenez, Sergio
    Angel Celis, Miguel
    Manuel Larraga-Gutierrez, Jose
    de Jesus Suarez-Campos, Jose
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2007, 67 (05): : 487 - 492
  • [20] Characteristics of a novel treatment system for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery
    Wen, Ning
    Li, Haisen
    Song, Kwang
    Chin-Snyder, Karen
    Qin, Yujiao
    Kim, Jinkoo
    Bellon, Maria
    Gulam, Misbah
    Gardner, Stephen
    Doemer, Anthony
    Devpura, Suneetha
    Gordon, James
    Chetty, Indrin
    Siddiqui, Farzan
    Ajlouni, Munther
    Pompa, Robert
    Hammoud, Zane
    Simoff, Michael
    Kalkanis, Steven
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Siddiqui, M. Salim
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (04): : 125 - 148