Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking

被引:65
|
作者
Ball, Harrison [1 ,2 ]
Stace, Thomas M. [3 ]
Flammia, Steven T. [1 ]
Biercuk, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, ARC Ctr Excellence Engn Quantum Syst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Measurement Inst, West Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Math & Phys, ARC Ctr Excellence Engn Quantum Syst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.93.022303
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Among the most popular and well-studied quantum characterization, verification, and validation techniques is randomized benchmarking (RB), an important statistical tool used to characterize the performance of physical logic operations useful in quantum information processing. In this work we provide a detailed mathematical treatment of the effect of temporal noise correlations on the outcomes of RB protocols. We provide a fully analytic framework capturing the accumulation of error in RB expressed in terms of a three-dimensional random walk in "Pauli space." Using this framework we derive the probability density function describing RB outcomes (averaged over noise) for both Markovian and correlated errors, which we show is generally described by a Gamma distribution with shape and scale parameters depending on the correlation structure. Long temporal correlations impart large nonvanishing variance and skew in the distribution towards high-fidelity outcomes-consistent with existing experimental data-highlighting potential finite-sampling pitfalls and the divergence of the mean RB outcome fromworst-case errors in the presence of noise correlations. We use the filter-transfer function formalism to reveal the underlying reason for these differences in terms of effective coherent averaging of correlated errors in certain random sequences. We conclude by commenting on the impact of these calculations on the utility of single-metric approaches to quantum characterization, verification, and validation.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Benchmarking for Non-Markovian Noise
    Figueroa-Romero, Pedro
    Modi, Kavan
    Harris, Robert J.
    Stace, Thomas M.
    Hsieh, Min-Hsiu
    PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (04):
  • [2] Randomized benchmarking with gate-dependent noise
    Wallnnan, Joel J.
    QUANTUM, 2018, 2
  • [3] Randomized benchmarking in the presence of time-correlated dephasing noise
    Qi, Jiaan
    Ng, Hui Khoon
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 103 (02)
  • [4] Qubit Metrology of Ultralow Phase Noise Using Randomized Benchmarking
    O'Malley, P. J. J.
    Kelly, J.
    Barends, R.
    Campbell, B.
    Chen, Y.
    Chen, Z.
    Chiaro, B.
    Dunsworth, A.
    Fowler, A. G.
    Hoi, I. -C.
    Jeffrey, E.
    Megrant, A.
    Mutus, J.
    Neill, C.
    Quintana, C.
    Roushan, P.
    Sank, D.
    Vainsencher, A.
    Wenner, J.
    White, T. C.
    Korotkov, A. N.
    Cleland, A. N.
    Martinis, John M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2015, 3 (04):
  • [5] Dynamically corrected gates suppressing spatiotemporal error correlations as measured by randomized benchmarking
    Edmunds, C. L.
    Hempel, C.
    Harris, R. J.
    Frey, V
    Stace, T. M.
    Biercuk, M. J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2020, 2 (01):
  • [6] Nonexponential fidelity decay in randomized benchmarking with low-frequency noise
    Fogarty, M. A.
    Veldhorst, M.
    Harper, R.
    Yang, C. H.
    Bartlett, S. D.
    Flammia, S. T.
    Dzurak, A. S.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2015, 92 (02):
  • [7] Spin-qubit noise spectroscopy from randomized benchmarking by supervised learning
    Zhang, Chengxian
    Wang, Xin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (04)
  • [8] Towards a general framework of Randomized Benchmarking incorporating non-Markovian Noise
    Figueroa-Romero, Pedro
    Modi, K.
    Hsieh, Min-Hsiu
    QUANTUM, 2022, 6
  • [9] Kramers problem for a dimer: Effect of noise correlations
    Singh, R. K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 95 (04)
  • [10] Partial randomized benchmarking
    Dubovitskii, Kirill
    Makhlin, Yuriy
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)