Clinical Outcomes of Impella Microaxial Devices Used to Salvage Cardiogenic Shock as a Bridge to Durable Circulatory Support or Cardiac Transplantation

被引:25
|
作者
Cheng, Richard [1 ]
Tank, Rikin [2 ]
Ramzy, Danny [3 ]
Azarbal, Babak [1 ]
Chung, Joshua [3 ]
Esmailian, Fardad [3 ]
Kobashigawa, Jon A. [1 ]
Moriguchi, Jaime D. [1 ]
Arabia, Francisco A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Heart Inst, Div Cardiol, 127 S San Vicente Blvd,Suite A3308, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Heart Inst, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Impella; severe cardiogenic shock; percutaneous temporary circulatory support; mechanical circulatory support; bridge to decision and transplantation; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; HEART-TRANSPLANTATION; ARTERY; METAANALYSIS; REMOVAL; ARREST;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000000877
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be a bridge to decision for patients in severe cardiogenic shock who may be eligible for durable support or transplantation. Outcomes with Impella microaxial devices for salvage of severe shock in the end-stage heart failure population are not well described. Patients who underwent Impella placement as a bridge to decision, durable MCS, or transplantation were included. Eighty Impella devices (2.5 [1.3%], CP [53.8%], and 5.0 [45.0%]) were placed in 64 patients. Implant age was 56.2 +/- 12.5 years. Mean duration of assisted support was 13.2 +/- 15.1 days, and median duration per device was 7 days (interquartile range: 3-14). A total of 48.4% were in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS 1) shock at implant, 51.6% in profile 2. Recent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (26.7%), ventilator use (67.2%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use (26.7%) were frequent. Forty four of sixty four (68.8%) survived to next therapy: durable MCS (40.9%), heart transplant (OHT) (36.4%), and recovery (22.7%). Overall 30 and 60 day survival were 67.2% and 65.6%, respectively. Thirty and 60 day survival conditional on having survived to next therapy were 94.1% and 91.2%, respectively. Survivors were less likely to be on ventilators (p = 0.049) or continuous renal replacement therapy (p < 0.001) but were otherwise not different from nonsurvivors by age, sex, INTERMACS profile, CPR, prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy, among other characteristics. Sixteen patients were directly bridged to heart transplantation, and all were alive at long-term follow-up. Impella devices can be used to salvage patients in severe heart failure as a bridge to decision, durable MCS, or transplantation. Baseline demographics are not predictive of survival. Their use for this indication is increasing and further investigations are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 648
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
    Khorsandi, Maziar
    Dougherty, Scott
    Sinclair, Andrew
    Buchan, Keith
    MacLennan, Fiona
    Bouamra, Omar
    Curry, Philip
    Zamvar, Vipin
    Berg, Geoffrey
    Al-Attar, Nawwar
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 11
  • [42] Vascular Complications in Patients With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock With Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes From a Large Nationwide Database
    Pahuja, Mohit
    Chehab, Omar
    Yassin, Ahmed
    Ranka, Sagar
    Mishra, Tushar
    Abubakar, Hossam
    Handa, Aman
    Tanvir, Khosla
    Ando, Tomo
    Kapur, Navin K.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [43] The Physiologic Basis and Clinical Outcomes of Combined Impella and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lim, Hoong Sern
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2020, 9 (02) : 245 - 255
  • [44] INPATIENT OUTCOMES OF SINGLE VERSUS COMBINED MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ISCHEMIC CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Pahuja, Mohit
    Ranka, Sagar
    Chehab, Omar
    Mony, Shruti
    Abubakar, Hossam
    Mishra, Tushar
    Ando, Tomo
    Shokr, Mohamed
    Yassin, Ahmed
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Afonso, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 903 - 903
  • [45] Female patients experience higher mortality and reduced utilisation of mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation after cardiogenic shock
    Brahmbhatt, D. H. Darshan
    Vishram-Nielsen, J. K. K.
    Scolari, F. L.
    Wang, V. N.
    Overgaard, C. B.
    Luk, A. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2022, 24 : 211 - 212
  • [46] Changes in Right Atrial Pressure Are Associated With Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Insights From the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group
    Davila, Carlos
    Morine, Kevin
    Esposito, Michele
    Thayer, Katherine
    Kapur, Navin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B800 - B800
  • [47] GENDER DIFFERENCES OF PROGNOSTIC VALUE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Aoyama, Rie
    Oka, Norikiyo
    Iwata, Yo
    Okino, Shinichi
    Fukuzawa, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1318 - 1318
  • [48] Congestive Profiles Correlate with Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Morine, Kevin
    Esposito, Michele
    Annamalai, Shiva
    Pedicini, Robert
    Jorde, Lena
    Gobeil, Kyle
    Hernandez-Montfort, Jamie
    Kapur, Navin
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (04) : S4 - S4
  • [49] TEMPORARY MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT AS A BRIDGE TO HEART TRANSPLANTATION. CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN UNI OR BIVENTRICULAR SUPPORT
    Absi, Daniel
    Giordanino, Elian
    Favaloro, Liliana
    Renedo, Florencia
    Rubira, Magali
    Favaloro, Roberto
    Bertolotti, Alejandro
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 55 - 55
  • [50] Bridge to cardiac transplantation with temporary mechanical circulatory support: trends and outcomes in Spain (2010-2020)
    Barge Caballero, E. Eduardo
    Gonzalez-Vilchez, F.
    Almenar-Bonet, L.
    Delgado, J.
    Gonzalez-Costello, J.
    Gomez-Bueno, M.
    Castel-Lavilla, M. A.
    Lambert-Rodriguez, J. L.
    Martinez-Selles, M.
    Mirabet-Perez, S.
    De la Fuente-Galan, L.
    Hervas-Sotomayor, D.
    Rangel-Sousa, D.
    Garrido-Bravo, I.
    Crespo-Leiro, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2022, 24 : 132 - 133