The use of BokaFlo™ instrument to measure salivary flow

被引:6
|
作者
Fallon, Braden S. [1 ]
Chase, Trevor J. [1 ]
Cooke, Elaine M. [1 ]
Ghazitabatabaei, Amir [1 ]
Naylor, Nathan O. [1 ]
Cutshall, Jordan J. [1 ]
Trump, Bryan G. [1 ]
Weller, Melodie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Dent, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
BokaFlo; BokaFlo (TM); Passive Drool Test; Xerostomia; Hyposalivation; Saliva Flow; Dry mouth; Sjogren's syndrome; Testing saliva flow; Sialometry; DRY MOUTH; ORAL MEDICINE; DIAGNOSIS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-021-01477-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundDry mouth currently affects roughly 20% of the population and is a condition characterized by chronic hyposalivation and/or subjective reports of xerostomia. Low saliva flow can be indicative of other undiagnosed diseases, such as primary Sjogren's syndrome, and may contribute to difficulty chewing, increased caries susceptibility and infection. The passive drool test (PDT) is the primary method used to evaluate patients for hyposalivation but it is time-consuming and inconvenient. New methodology is needed to facilitate increased testing for hyposalivation in the dental clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate an alternative method to measure salivary flow in dental offices.MethodsIn this study, we tested a new biomedical device, the BokaFlo (TM), to measure salivary flow in subjects in comparison to the current PDT standard. Participants completed an oral health questionnaire and saliva flow was evaluated by the PDT and the BokaFlo (TM) system.ResultsSaliva flow as measured by the BokaFlo (TM) positively correlated with the saliva flow measured by the PDT methodology (r=0.22, p<0.05). The device predicted low saliva flow in subjects with a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.84 for subjects with hyposalivation, defined as a saliva flow rate of<less than or equal to>0.1 ml/min. A significant negative correlation between the total oral health questionnaire score and the likelihood of participant exhibiting low salivary flow was observed (r=-0.31, p<0.006).ConclusionThe BokaFlo<(TM)> was effectively able to measure low saliva flow correlating with the PDT methodology and may provide more efficient testing of saliva flow in the dental office.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of the Resident Assessment Instrument to Measure Depression in Indigenous Home Care Clients
    Maranzan, K. Amanda
    Stones, Michael J.
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 36 (05) : 421 - 439
  • [32] Treatment Fidelity Instrument to Measure a Brief Opportunistic Intervention for Prenatal Substance Use
    Torrey, Antonia Rae
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2012, 41 (06): : 809 - 820
  • [33] Association between crack cocaine use and reduced salivary flow
    Antoniazzi, Raquel Pippi
    Sari, Amanda Rodrigues
    Casarin, Maisa
    Braganca de Moraes, Cristina Machado
    Feldens, Carlos Alberto
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2017, 31 : 1 - 7
  • [34] Establishment of a method to measure the salivary flow rates in the lower labial mucosal region.
    Ogami, K.
    Sakurai, K.
    Ando, T.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B349 - B349
  • [35] Development of an instrument to measure professionalism
    Chisholm, Marie A.
    Cobb, Henry
    Duke, Lori
    McDuffie, Charles
    Kennedy, William K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 70 (04)
  • [36] AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE SERVOMECHANISM PERFORMANCE
    TARPLEY, HI
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1947, 18 (01): : 39 - 43
  • [37] Use of floodgates as flow measure structures in irrigation canals
    Mojarro, BD
    Rubio, BR
    Pimentel, LR
    Hernández, VP
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT III, 2005, 80 : 507 - 515
  • [38] DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE HOPE
    MILLER, JF
    POWERS, MJ
    NURSING RESEARCH, 1988, 37 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [39] An instrument measure the resistivity of Slag
    Bolton, R.L.J.
    Elektron, 1999, 16 (03):
  • [40] AUDIOTAPE AS AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE FACILITATIVENESS
    SUGGS, RC
    KANDOR, JR
    COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION, 1976, 16 (01) : 76 - 78