Nutritional quality of Australian breakfast cereals. Are they improving?

被引:32
|
作者
Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu [2 ,5 ]
Dunford, Elizabeth K. [1 ,3 ]
Walker, Karen Z. [4 ]
Gill, Timothy P. [2 ]
机构
[1] George Inst Global Hlth, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Boden Inst Obesity Nutr Exercise & Eating Disorde, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Melbourne, Vic 3168, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Sch Hlth Sci, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
Breakfast cereals; Nutritional quality; Traffic light labelling; DIG labelling; Australia; TO-EAT CEREALS; NUTRIENT INTAKE; DAIRY-PRODUCTS; WEIGHT STATUS; AGED; CONSUMPTION; FOOD; CHILDREN; INFORMATION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The nutritional quality of Australian breakfast cereals is not systematically monitored despite the importance of breakfast for general health. We examined whether the nutritional quality of Australian breakfast cereals has improved between 2004 and 2010, and whether any change could be detected after the introduction of Daily Intake Guide (DIG) front-of-pack labelling. Supermarket surveys were conducted in 2004 and 2010 using the same methodology to collect information from the nutrition information panels of Australian breakfast cereals and the nutrient content of cereals was compared by year. Breakfast cereals with and without DIG labelling in 2010 were also compared. Nutritional quality was assessed using UK Traffic Light criteria. No significant difference was detected in nutritional composition of breakfast cereals between 2004 and 2010. There was no notable improvement in nutritional composition of breakfast cereals marketed as the same product in both years. Overall there has been little improvement in the nutritional quality of Australian breakfast cereals in the 6 year period. A large proportion of Australian breakfast cereals were considered high sugar. In conclusion, the introduction of DIG labelling does not appear to have promoted product reformulation, and breakfast cereals carrying DIG labels were not consistently healthier. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 470
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cholesterol and weight change following daily high or low fiber breakfast cereals.
    Geliebter, A
    Yahav, E
    Haq, S
    Hashim, SA
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 2000, 8 : 25S - 25S
  • [22] COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE NUTRITIONAL CONTENTS OF BREAKFAST CEREALS
    NIERLE, W
    ELBAYA, AW
    WOLFF, J
    DEUTSCHE LEBENSMITTEL-RUNDSCHAU, 1982, 78 (08) : 292 - 292
  • [23] Occurrence of Furosine and Hydroxymethylfurfural in Breakfast Cereals. Evolution of the Spanish Market from 2006 to 2018
    Mesias, Marta
    Saez-Escudero, Laura
    Morales, Francisco J.
    Delgado-Andrade, Cristina
    FOODS, 2019, 8 (05):
  • [24] Reassessment of acrylamide content in breakfast cereals. Evolution of the Spanish market from 2006 to 2018
    Mesias, Marta
    Saez-Escudero, Laura
    Morales, Francisco J.
    Delgado-Andrade, Cristina
    FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 105 : 94 - 101
  • [25] On testing varieties of cereals.
    不详
    BIOMETRIKA, 1923, 15 : 271 - 293
  • [26] Prehistoric Wheat and Cereals.
    Desmaisons, H.
    BULLETIN DE LA SOCIETE PREHISTORIQUE FRANCAISE, 1935, 32 (06): : 336 - 343
  • [27] Studies on the maturation of cereals.
    Lucers, H
    BIOCHEMISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1920, 104 : 30 - 81
  • [28] Impact of guar gum and wheat bran on the physical and nutritional quality of extruded breakfast cereals
    Brennan, Margaret A.
    Merts, Inge
    Monro, John
    Woolnough, James
    Brennan, Charles S.
    STARCH-STARKE, 2008, 60 (05): : 248 - 256
  • [29] Enrichment with citrus peels as a strategy for improving the health benefits and nutritional value of breakfast cereals: A review
    Ademosun, Ayokunle Olubode
    HUMAN NUTRITION & METABOLISM, 2024, 36
  • [30] Septoria diseases of cereals.
    Weber, GF
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1922, 12 (10) : 449 - U5