Experimental Performance Evaluation of Multi-Storey Steel Plate Shear Walls Designed by Different Methods

被引:12
|
作者
Xu, Tao [1 ]
Shao, Jian-Hua [1 ]
Zhang, Ji-Ye [1 ]
Kaewunruen, Sakdirat [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Nanxu Rd, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Birmingham, UOB, Gisbert Kapp Bldg G8, Edgbaston B15 2TT, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Steel plate shear wall; Performance evaluation; Ductility; Over-strength factor; Strength assurance coefficient; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE; LIGHT-GAUGE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s40999-018-0374-0
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In accordance with two different design methods including the technical specification for steel structures of tall buildings and the shear-bearing capacity method for infilled steel wall plates, two types of steel plate shear wall with unstiffened panels have been designed and constructed. All shear wall specimens are exposed to ultimate static monotonic and low horizontal cyclic loading conditions to determine their structural behaviors under an idealized severe earthquake event. The seismic performances of these two types of specimens are identified by the overall roof displacement angle, lateral stiffness, ductility, different distribution of horizontal force and overturning moment, and inclined angle of diagonal tension field. These two types of steel plate shear wall exhibit excellent seismic performance. However, the specimens with thin infill plate thickness of 1.1mm perform better than the thicker specimens with plate thickness of 3.75mm. In terms of serviceability performance, the experimental results exhibit that the thicker specimens designed by the technical specification tend to be more conservative. Their over-strength factor, strength assurance coefficient and drift angle are 4.98, 6.3 and 1/1335, respectively. However, the thinner specimens designed by the shear capacity method for shear panel yield the serviceability performance factors of 2.22, 2.71 and 1/407, respectively. It is important to note that design practice generally adopts the over-strength factor between 2 and 3, and the strength assurance coefficient is often designed for 3 and the maximum inter-story drift limit given by the design specification is 1/300. On this ground, it is apparent that the shear-bearing capacity method enables relatively more economical compared to the technical specification for steel structures.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1154
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS.
    Timler, P.A.
    Kulak, G.L.
    Structural Engineering Report, 1983, (114):
  • [22] Blast Resistance of Steel Plate Shear Walls Designed for Seismic Loading
    Warn, Gordon P.
    Bruneau, Michel
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2009, 135 (10): : 1222 - 1230
  • [23] Seismic performance of multi-storey steel frames with semi-rigid joints
    Venneri, Greta Agata
    Di Girolamo, Giuseppe Giampaolo
    Memmo, Ivan
    Brando, Giuseppe
    De Matteis, Gianfranco
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 291 - 298
  • [24] Performance based design approach for multi-storey concentrically braced steel frames
    Salawdeh, Suhaib
    Goggins, Jamie
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 20 (04): : 749 - 776
  • [25] Experimental study of the hysteretic behaviour of corrugated steel plate shear walls and steel plate reinforced concrete composite shear walls
    Wang, Wei
    Ren, Yingzi
    Lu, Zheng
    Song, Jiangliang
    Han, Bin
    Zhou, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2019, 160 : 136 - 152
  • [26] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF A 55-STOREY STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL
    Youssef, Nabih
    Wilkerson, Ryan
    Fischer, Kurt
    Tunick, Daniel
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2010, 19 (1-2): : 139 - 165
  • [27] Validation and application of analytical design approach for multi-storey platform-type CLT shear walls
    Masroor, Mohammad
    Tannert, Thomas
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 327
  • [28] Seismic analysis of multi-storey timber buildings braced with a CLT core and perimeter shear-walls
    Andrea Polastri
    Matteo Izzi
    Luca Pozza
    Cristiano Loss
    Ian Smith
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17 : 1009 - 1028
  • [29] Universal strip model for buckling-restrained steel plate shear walls and unstiffened steel plate shear walls with different plate thicknesses
    Tian, Weifeng
    Zuo, Jinbo
    Zhong, Weihui
    Hao, Jiping
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42 (09): : 148 - 158
  • [30] Seismic analysis of multi-storey timber buildings braced with a CLT core and perimeter shear-walls
    Polastri, Andrea
    Izzi, Matteo
    Pozza, Luca
    Loss, Cristiano
    Smith, Ian
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (02) : 1009 - 1028