The Shape of Posterior Sclera as a Biometric Signature in Open-angle Glaucoma: An Intereye Comparison Study

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Yong Chan [1 ]
Koo, Yong Ho [2 ]
Hwang, Hyung Bin [1 ]
Kang, Kui Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Incheon St Marys Hosp, 56 Dongsu Ro, Incheon 21431, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Chuncheon Si, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
glaucoma; posterior sclera; intereye comparison; OPTIC-NERVE HEAD; LAMINA-CRIBROSA DISPLACEMENT; NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA; COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; 3-DIMENSIONAL EVALUATION; RISK-FACTORS; PERIPAPILLARY; THICKNESS; MYOPIA; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000001573
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To characterize intereye differences in posterior segment parameters and determine their significance in open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral damage. Methods: Both eyes from 65 subjects without any nerve damage and 43 patients undergoing treatment for unilateral open-angle glaucoma were included in this study. A 12.0x9.0x2.6 mm volume of the posterior segment in each eye was scanned with swept-source optical coherence tomography. Coronally reconstructed optical coherence tomography images were analyzed to determine the deepest point of the eye (DPE), which we then calculated the distance (Disc-DPE distance), depth (Disc-DPE depth), angle (Disc-DPE angle) from the optic disc center to the DPE. Posterior pole shape was analyzed measuring the posterior pole-cross-sectional area, posterior pole-horizontal width (PP-HW), and posterior pole-vertical width) of the posterior pole. These measurements and their intereye absolute difference (IAD; absolute difference in measurements between the right and left eyes) values were compared between the healthy and unilateral glaucomatous patients. Results: The posterior sclera measurements, including the Disc-DPE distance, Disc-DPE depth, and posterior pole-cross-sectional area, were significantly different between the unilateral glaucoma eyes and contralateral healthy eyes (P=0.043,P=0.035, andP=0.049, respectively). By contrast, none of the intereye differences in optic nerve head parameters were significant in the unilateral glaucoma patients. In comparison with the IAD values, the baseline intraocular pressure and PP-HW of the posterior segment showed significant differences between the healthy and the unilateral glaucoma patients (P=0.019 andP=0.036, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed that a larger baseline intraocular pressure IAD [odds ratio (OR), 1.381;P=0.009)] and larger PP-HW IAD (OR, 1.324;P=0.032) were significantly associated with the presence of glaucoma. Conclusions: Compared with the fellow healthy eyes, glaucomatous eyes had larger and more steeply curved posterior poles, which represent a structural variation of the posterior sclera that might be associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 898
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary open-angle glaucoma
    Weinreb, RN
    Khaw, PT
    LANCET, 2004, 363 (9422): : 1711 - 1720
  • [22] SECONDARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA
    ZIMMERMAN, LE
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1963, 69 (04) : 421 - &
  • [23] CHRONIC OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA
    SHAFFER, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1965, 191 (05): : 426 - &
  • [24] TREATMENT OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA
    PHELPS, CD
    DRUG THERAPY, 1977, 7 (04) : 68 - &
  • [25] UNIOCULAR OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA
    DRANCE, SM
    WHEELER, C
    PATTULLO, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1968, 65 (06) : 891 - &
  • [27] Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Sharts-Hopko, Nancy C.
    Glynn-Milley, Catherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2009, 109 (02) : 40 - 47
  • [28] Primary open-angle glaucoma
    Goldberg, I
    Graham, SL
    Healey, PR
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 177 (10) : 535 - 536
  • [29] Open-angle glaucoma in Zaire
    Kaimbo, WA
    Kaimbo, D
    Missotten, L
    VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 : 23 - 23
  • [30] Therapy for Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Marshall, Leisa L.
    Hayslett, Renee L.
    Stevens, Gregg A.
    CONSULTANT PHARMACIST, 2018, 33 (08): : 432 - 445