Recovered finite element methods

被引:19
|
作者
Georgoulis, Emmanuil H. [1 ,2 ]
Pryer, Tristan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Math, Univ Rd, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Appl Math & Phys Sci, Zografos 15780, Greece
[3] Univ Reading, Dept Math & Stat, POB 220, Reading RG6 6AX, Berks, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Finite element method; Conforming recovery operator; A priori error analysis; A posteriori error bound; Discontinuous Galerkin; DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS; INCOMPRESSIBLE ELASTICITY; APPROXIMATIONS; CONVERGENCE; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We introduce a family of Galerkin finite element methods which are constructed via recovery operators over element-wise discontinuous approximation spaces. This new family, termed collectively as recovered finite element methods (R-FEM) has a number of attractive features over both classical finite element and discontinuous Galerkin approaches, most important of which is its potential to produce stable conforming approximations in a variety of settings. Moreover, for special choices of recovery operators, R-FEM produces the same approximate solution as the classical conforming finite element method, while, trivially, one can recast (primal formulation) discontinuous Galerkin methods. A priori error bounds are shown for linear second order boundary value problems, verifying the optimality of the proposed method. Residual-type a posteriori bounds are also derived, highlighting the potential of R-FEM in the context of adaptive computations. Numerical experiments highlight the good approximation properties of the method in practice. A discussion on the potential use of R-FEM in various settings is also included. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 324
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
    MORTON, KW
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1976, 12 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [22] Combined use of the finite element and finite superelement methods
    Galanin M.P.
    Savenkov E.B.
    Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2006, 46 (2) : 258 - 270
  • [23] Comparison of finite element reliability methods
    Sudret, B
    Kiureghian, AD
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2002, 17 (04) : 337 - 348
  • [24] Finite element methods for rolling contact
    Wriggers, P
    ROLLING CONTACT PHENOMENA, 2000, (411): : 85 - 162
  • [25] HYBRID FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
    FIX, G
    NOTICES OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1975, 22 (06): : A659 - A659
  • [26] Implementing advanced finite element methods
    Holzer, SM
    TRENDS IN COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURAL MECHANICS, 2001, : 328 - 337
  • [27] Recent Advances in Finite Element Methods
    Beuchler, Sven
    Roesch, Arnd
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 23 (04) : 813 - 815
  • [28] Finite Element Methods with Patches and Applications
    Glowinski, Roland
    He, Jiwen
    Lozinski, Alexei
    Picasso, Marco
    Rappaz, Jacques
    Rezzonico, Vittoria
    Wagner, Joël
    Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 2007, 55 : 77 - 89
  • [29] HESSIAN RECOVERY FOR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS
    Guo, Hailong
    Zhang, Zhimin
    Zhao, Ren
    MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 2017, 86 (306) : 1671 - 1692
  • [30] ON THE CONVERGENCE OF FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
    GLAHN, H
    INGENIEUR ARCHIV, 1983, 53 (05): : 329 - 336