Independence of Biomechanical Forces and Craniofacial Pneumatization in Cebus

被引:28
|
作者
Rae, Todd C. [1 ]
Koppe, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Evolutionary Anthropol Res Grp, Dept Anthropol, Durham DH1 3HN, England
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Anat & Zellbiol, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
maxillary sinus volume; pneumatization; platyrrhine primates; craniofacial morphology;
D O I
10.1002/ar.20786
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Several different factors have been hypothesized as explanations of variation in primate paranasal sinus size. Biomechanical forces, particularly those associated with mastication, are frequently evoked to account for differences in primate craniofacial pneumatization. To test whether masticatory stresses are responsible for maxillary sinus volume diversity, two platyrrhine species of the genus Cebus (C. apella and C. albifrons) were examined. The former has been identified as a hard object feeder, and many morphological differences between the two species are attributable to differences in the mechanical properties of their respective diets. Sinus volumes were derived from serial coronal CT scans of the crania of adults. Several external cranial measurements were used to scale sinus volume relative to the size of the face. Relative measures of maxillary sinus volume were compared using standard statistical techniques. In all comparisons, the two capuchin species do not differ from one another significantly at P < 0.05. Thus, this "natural experiment" fails to support the interpretation that biomechanical forces acting on the facial skeleton substantially affect the degree of paranasal pneumatization in primates. This result suggests that it is unlikely that the maxillary sinus performs any function in relation to masticatory stress; other factors must be responsible for the variation in sinus volume among primates. Anat Rec, 291:1414-1419, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1419
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A biomechanical model for soft tissue simulation in craniofacial surgery
    Gladilin, E
    Zachow, S
    Deuflhard, P
    Hege, HC
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MEDICAL IMAGING AND AUGMENTED REALITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 137 - 141
  • [22] Biomechanical Effects of Fixed Functional Appliance on Craniofacial Structures
    Panigrahi, Priyankar
    Vineeth, Varadarajan
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (04) : 668 - 675
  • [23] Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery
    Meyer, U
    Kleinheinz, J
    Joos, U
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 32 (03) : 140 - 149
  • [24] ENDOCRINE AND BIOMECHANICAL CONTROL OF CRANIOFACIAL GROWTH - EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
    RIESENFELD, A
    HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1974, 46 (03) : 531 - 572
  • [25] A biomechanical approach to craniofacial shape in primates, using FESA
    Preuschoft, H
    Witzel, U
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2004, 186 (5-6) : 397 - 404
  • [27] Biomechanical behaviour of craniofacial sutures during distraction: An evaluation all over the entire craniofacial skeleton
    Savoldi, Fabio
    Tsoi, James K. H.
    Paganelli, Corrado
    Matinlinna, Jukka P.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2017, 33 (07) : E290 - E300
  • [28] BIOMECHANICAL BASES OF SPINAL MUSCLE FORCES
    KUMAR, S
    ERGONOMICS INTERNATIONAL 88, 1988, : 293 - 295
  • [29] Estimates of biomechanical forces in Magnaporthe grisea
    Goriely, Alain
    Tabor, Michael
    MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 110 : 755 - 759
  • [30] INDEPENDENCE AND RESISTANCE TO PERCEPTUAL FIELD FORCES
    JACKSON, DN
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1958, 56 (02): : 279 - 281