Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany

被引:532
|
作者
Kabisch, Nadja [1 ,2 ]
Haase, Dagmar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Geog, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Urban green space provisioning; User preferences; Socio-environmental justice; Berlin; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PARKS; TREES; FORM; ENVIRONMENT; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; HEALTH; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Urban green spaces (UGS) have been shown to provide a number of environmental and social benefits relevant for a higher quality of life of residents. However, population growth in cities combined with urban planning policies of (re)densification can drive the conversion of UGS into residential land. This development might result in an unequal distribution of UGS in a city. We present an analysis of UGS provisioning in Berlin, Germany in order to identify distributional inequities between UGS and population which are further discussed in light of variations in user preferences associated with demographics and immigrant status. Publicly available land use and sociodemographic data at sub-district level are applied in a GIS, dissimilarity index and cluster analysis approach. Results show that although most areas are supplied with more UGS compared to the per capita target value of 6 m(2), there is considerable dissimilarity by immigrant status and age. To address rising concerns about socio-environmental justice in cities and to evaluate the (dis)advantages of applying UGS threshold values for urban planning, visitor profiles and preferences of a site-specific case, the park and former city airport Berlin-Tempelhof are analyzed. Results from questionnaire surveys indicate that the identified dissimilarities on sub-district level are not the same as socio-environmental injustice in Tempelhof, but point to a mismatch of UGS and user preferences. In addition to evaluating UGS distribution, the match between quality of a park and specific cultural and age dependent user needs should be considered for successful green infrastructure planning rather than focusing on target values. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 139
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Remote Sensing of Urban Green Spaces
    Siregar, Dodi Fanhalen
    Putry, Regata Ringga Hanessa
    Janna, Rihul
    Umah, Daiyatul
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2024, 101
  • [22] QUALITY PARAMETERS OF URBAN GREEN SPACES
    Stanescu, Anca
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2013, 57 : 381 - 386
  • [23] Evaluation of urban green spaces in Bratislava
    Reháchová, T
    Pauditsová, E
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2004, 9 (06): : 469 - 477
  • [24] Benefits and Challenges of Urban Green Spaces
    Mwendwa, Patrick
    Giliba, Richard A.
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [25] Benefits and Challenges of Urban Green Spaces
    Patrick Mwendwa
    Richard A.Giliba
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2012, (01) : 73 - 79
  • [26] The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces
    Colding, Johan
    Gren, Asa
    Barthel, Stephan
    LAND, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [27] The Racist Legacy of Urban Green Spaces
    Murphy, Asia
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2024, 112 (03) : 142 - 147
  • [28] Got green? addressing environmental justice in park provision
    Sister C.
    Wolch J.
    Wilson J.
    GeoJournal, 2010, 75 (03) : 229 - 248
  • [29] Just green enough or green gentrification?
    Smardon, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (02) : 415 - 416
  • [30] Just green enough or green gentrification?
    Richard Smardon
    Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2022, 12 : 415 - 416