Large intracranial metastatic tumors treated by Gamma Knife surgery: outcomes and prognostic factors

被引:38
|
作者
Lee, Cheng-Chia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yen, Chun-P [2 ]
Xu, Zhiyuan [2 ]
Schlesinger, David [1 ,2 ]
Sheehan, Jason [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Neurol Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Neurol Inst, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
intracranial metastatic tumor; Gamma Knife; stereotactic radiosurgery; outcome; oncology; BRAIN METASTASES; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.3171/2013.9.JNS131163
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The use of radiosurgery has been well accepted for treating small to medium-size metastatic brain tumors (MBTs). However, its utility in treating large MBTs remains uncertain due to potentially unfavorable effects such as progressive perifocal brain edema and neurological deterioration. In this retrospective study the authors. evaluated the local tumor control rate and analyzed possible factors affecting tumor and brain edema response. Methods. The authors defined a large brain metastasis as one with a measurement of 3 cm or more in at least one of the 3 cardinal planes (coronal, axial, or sagittal). A consecutive series of 109 patients with 119 large intracranial metastatic lesions were treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) between October 2000 and December 2012; the median tumor volume was 16.8 cm(3) (range 6.0-74.8 cm(3)). The pre-GKS Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score for these patients ranged from 70 to 100. The most common tumors of origin were non small cell lung cancers (29.4% of cases in this series). Thirty-six patients (33.0%) had previously undergone a craniotomy (1-3 times) for tumor resection. Forty-three patients (39.4%) underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before GKS. Patients were treated with GKS and followed clinically and radiographically at 2- to 3-month intervals thereafter. Results. The median duration of iinaging follow-up after GKS for patients with large MBTs in this series was 6.3 months. In the first follow-up MRI studies (performed within 3 months after GKS), 77 lesions (64.7%) had regressed, 24 (20.2%) were stable, and 18 (15.1%) were found to have grown. Peritumoral brain edema as defined on T2-weighted MRI sequences had decreased in 79 lesions (66.4%), was stable in 21(17.6%), but had progressed in 19 (16.0%). In the group of patients who survived longer than 6 months (76 patients with 77 MBTs), 88.3% of the MBTs (68 of 77 lesions) had regressed or remained stable at the most recent imaging follow-up, and 89.6% (69 of 77 lesions) showed regression of perifocal brain edema volume or stable condition. The median duration of survival after GKS was 8.3 months for patients with large MBTs. Patients with small cell lung cancer and no previous WBRT had a significantly higher tumor control rate as well as better brain edema relief. Patients with a single metastasis, better KPS scores, and no previous radiosurgery or WBRT were more likely to decrease corticosteroid use after GKS. On the other hand, higher pre-GKS KPS score was the only factor that showed a statistically significant association with longer survival. Conclusions. Treating large MBTs using either microsurgery or radiosurgery is a challenge for neurosurgeons. In selected patients with large brain metastases, radiosurgery offered a reasonable local tumor control rate and favorable functional preservation. Exacerbation of underlying edema was rare in this case series. Far more commonly, edema and steroid use were lessened after radiosurgery. Radiosurgery appears to be a reasonable option for some patients with large MBTs.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Solitary brain metastases treated with the Leksell gamma knife:: prognostic factors for patients
    Simonová, G
    Liscák, R
    Novotny, J
    Novotny, J
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 57 (02) : 207 - 213
  • [32] Outcomes of Gamma Knife surgery for craniopharyngiomas
    Xu, Zhiyuan
    Yen, Chun-Po
    Schlesinger, David
    Sheehan, Jason
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 104 (01) : 305 - 313
  • [33] Observations of intracranial neoplasms treated with gamma knife radiosurgery
    Szeifert, GT
    Massager, N
    DeVriendt, D
    David, P
    De Smedt, F
    Rorive, S
    Salmon, I
    Brotchi, J
    Levivier, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 : 623 - 626
  • [34] Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors A 2-institute study in Japan
    Serizawa, Toru
    Yamamoto, Masaaki
    Nagano, Osamu
    Higuchi, Yoshinori
    Matsuda, Sinji
    Ono, Junichi
    Iwadate, Yasuo
    Saeki, Naokatsu
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 109 : 118 - 121
  • [35] REGRESSION CURVES FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS AFTER GAMMA KNIFE SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION
    Kosaki, K.
    Shibamoto, Y.
    Hirai, T.
    Hatano, M.
    Tomita, N.
    Mori, Y.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Hayashi, N.
    Oda, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S216 - S216
  • [36] Gamma Knife surgery in the management of orbital tumors
    Xu, Desheng
    Liu, Dong
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Yipei
    Li, Yanhe
    Liu, Xamin
    Jia, Qiang
    Zheng, Ligao
    Song, Guoxiang
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 113 : 34 - 38
  • [37] GAMMA-KNIFE SURGERY IN ACOUSTIC TUMORS
    NOREN, G
    GREITZ, D
    HIRSCH, A
    LAX, I
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1993, : 104 - 107
  • [38] Gamma knife radiosurgery of radiation-induced intracranial tumors: Local control, outcomes, and complications
    Jensen, AW
    Brown, PD
    Pollock, BE
    Stafford, SL
    Link, MJ
    Garces, YI
    Foote, RL
    Gorman, DA
    Schomberg, PJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [39] Gamma knife radiosurgery of radiation-induced intracranial tumors: Local control, outcomes, and complications
    Jensen, AW
    Brown, PD
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 6 (04) : 360 - 361
  • [40] Outcomes of gamma knife treatment for solid intracranial hemangioblastomas
    Karabagli, Hakan
    Genc, Ali
    Karabagli, Pinar
    Abacioglu, Ufuk
    Seker, Askin
    Kilic, Turker
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 17 (06) : 706 - 710